• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Are landlords entitled to see tenants references obtained by their agents?

April 15, 2010 by Tessa J Shepperson

Will your agent let you see your tenants references?Over the years that I have been acting for landlords, I have heard many complaints about letting agents (and not a few from letting agents about landlords!). The most common complaint though, is that the agent refuses to allow the landlord to see the references they have obtained about tenants.

Indeed landlords often complain that they find out about prospective tenants only after they have been installed in their property, and have not been given any information about them at all. When they ask for information they either get no response or the agent says it is forbidden under the Data Protection Act.

What is the legal situation here?

People often do not realise that when someone is employed as an agent, this is a specific legal relationship with its own legal rules: the law of agency. In an agency situation there are three parties:

  • The principal (ie the landlord)
  • The third party (ie the tenant), and
  • The agent (ie the letting agent).

Any contract made, will be between the principal/landlord and the third party/tenant. The agent will be the person who negotiates this on behalf of the landlord and who sets it up. However if anything goes wrong, the tenant will (other than in a few specific exceptions, such as tenancy deposits) need to sue the landlord rather than the agent.

The agent is in a responsible position therefore, as he has the power to bind the landlord in a contract, which the landlord knows nothing about. When dealing with an agent, a tenant is entitled to rely on promises made by the agent on the landlords behalf. For example if a landlord says ‘no pets’ to his agent but the agent agrees that the tenant can keep his staffordshire bull terrier in the property, the landlord will be bound by that.

So legally the agent is like an extension of the landlord, and legally, dealing with an authorised agent is the same as dealing with the landlord direct.

Because he is in such a powerful position, agents have what is known as a ‘fiduciary relationship’ with the landlord. I discussed this in my previous blog post here. One of the elements of this is the duty of the agent to account to the principal and also to hand over all documents produced by him for the purpose of the agency relationship.

But where does this leave references obtained by the agent on the tenant? To a certain extent this is governed by the terms and conditions of the agency contract. If the landlord signs an agency agreement which specifically states that he will not have access to any of the tenants referencing, he will probably be bound by this.

However what if, which is probably more common, the contact is silent on this point?

This begs the question of who the reference actually belongs to. I would suggest that it is the property of the landlord, as it was obtained by the agent for the purpose of the landlords property, in his capacity as agent for the landlord. It is also paid for by the landlord, although in many cases the landlord will be refunded by the tenant. However it is the landlord who is ultimately responsible for the cost of referencing. Agents are in the business of making money from their agency work, not being out of pocket by paying personally for referencing tenants.

If the reference is the landlords property therefore, has the agent the right to refuse to let the landlord see it?

Well there is something called an ‘agents lien’. This entitles an agent to hang on to his principals property until he gets paid. However, if he has been paid, then he has no excuse to withhold the property.

What then of the agents normal argument that passing the reference on will be in breach of the Data Protection Act? Well this is quite interesting. If you visit the Information Commissioners Office web-site, you will find on this page,  it says:

Can landlords see references which were provided to the letting agents?
The agent can pass this information to the landlord, as long as, when the reference is asked for, they make clear to the tenant and the referee that this will happen.

The qualification here rather seems to go against what I have always understood to be a principle in the agency / principal relationship, i.e. that the agent is merely an extension or arm of the principal, and is obliged to account to him for everything that he does including all the principal’s property, subject to his lien.

There are two important reasons why the landlord should be entitled to see the references if he wishes, in particular before the tenancy is granted:

1. Landlords can suffer massive losses through bad tenants being allowed into their property, both through unpaid rent and through the tenant actually damaging the fabric of the property itself.

2. They may also want to check that the agent has carried out any referencing at all. Sadly it is not unknown for agents to pocket the reference fees and not actually get the reference. I have also known of several cases where the referencing done was grossly inadequate for the type of property being let (for example in in a case involving a high rent property a year or so ago, where the landlord suffered losses of over £20,000 before we were able to obtain an order for possession and evict the tenant).

If the agent is able to say “sorry, can’t tell you anything about the references we got, Data Protection Act”, how can the landlord be sure that this important part of the agents job has been done properly?

So my view is that, notwithstanding the Data Commissioners guidance (which is simply guidance, not legislation) the landlord is entitled to see the references (subject to the agents lien) as:

  • They are his property
  • He has a right to know about the tenant who is being installed in his property (in view of his potential losses if the tenant is unsatisfactory), and
  • He has a right to check that the agent is carrying out his job properly

However to avoid any problems, I would advise landlords to make it very clear, when they instruct an agent, that they will want to see the references, before the tenant is approved.

And also make it clear that it is the agents responsibility to take such steps as are necessary (ie tell the tenants and the reference agency) in order to prevent their being in breach of Data Protection Act by passing references over to the landlord.

You should also check over very carefully your agents’ terms and conditions before you sign them, and make sure that this is written in before you sign (or if necessary write it in yourself before you sign).

Rent Arrears

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: letting agents

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« James Davis – Notable Property Persons in their own words
Tenancy deposit arbitrations (ADR) – common mistakes »

Comments

  1. David says

    April 16, 2010 at 10:28 AM

    Would the issue of court proceedings not be exempt as I seem to remember data protection includes a “court case” exemption?

    In your bull terrier example, is the agent not acting outside his authority and therefore the landlord is not bound but the agent would be liable?

  2. Tessa Shepperson says

    April 16, 2010 at 6:50 PM

    Thank you for your comments. My understanding in the bull terrier situation, is that the landlord would be bound by the agents action. The agent will have ‘ostensible authority’ which the tenant is entitled to rely on – how is he supposed to know that the agent is exceeding his instructions?

    You are correct in saying that agents cannot issue court claims, thank you for mentioning this. I write about this issue here.

  3. Linny says

    May 17, 2010 at 1:03 PM

    I have a different issue with my managing agent. They actually send me the references and want me to sign that I approve them. Yet they are the experts so why are they asking me to do this, unless to wriggle out of any liability.

  4. Tessa Shepperson says

    May 17, 2010 at 1:38 PM

    They sound like a canny firm! Yes, if you have seen and approved the references then it is more difficult for you to blame the agents if the tenant proves to be a bad one.

    However as landlord you are ulitmately responsible and at least you can be sure that references have actually been taken, and have an idea of the sort of person who will be living in your property.

    You could try to pass the buck back to them by sending a covering letter saying that the references appear all right to you (assuming they do) but that you are relying on their greater expertise and experience to guide you in choosing the correct tenant, and that this is the reason why you are using their service.

  5. Richard Snith says

    July 19, 2010 at 6:38 PM

    I have a slightly different issue in that my current letting agents are refusing to complete the referencing forms for my new letting agents until I have found someone to replace myself in a joint tenancy. Can they withhold this information until such a time?

  6. Tessa Shepperson says

    July 19, 2010 at 6:49 PM

    Until you find someone to take your place in your current tenancy, and a new tenancy agreement is signed, you are the legal tenant and are legally responsible for the rent (whether or not you are actually living at the property).

    It is understandable that the agents are unwilling to assist you find alternative accommodation when you are still legally liable for the current property.

    If they did complete the forms no doubt they would say that you are still liable under an existing tenancy, which would not help your application greatly, as I suspect you cannot afford to pay for both.

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Sign up to our
>> daily updates

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Tessa Shepperson

Why you need and how to get proper legal advice on landlord and tenant issues

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept