• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

Two tenancy deposit decisions

March 10, 2011 by Tessa J Shepperson

Problems about tenancy deposits

The law on tenancy deposits and the three times the deposit penalty for non compliance is a bit up in the air at the moment.  There are, I understand, several cases in the pipeline waiting for High Court and (perhaps) Court of Appeal decisions, plus there are the potential changes in the Localism Bill.

However in the meantime, two County Court  decisions were reported in the March edition of Legal Action Magazine, one where an awared was refused and another where an award was granted.

Soens-Hughes v. Lewis

22 December 2010, West London County Court

In this case Ms Lewis thought that the deposit had been protected by her agents, but of course it was not (otherwise there wouldn’t have been a case).  The deposit was £1,680 and was not protected at any time.

On 30 May 2009 Mr Soens-Hughes left the flat and the tenancy ended.  He was paid most of his deposit in July but the landlord withheld £130 for cleaning and other expenses.

In January 2010 Mr Soens-Hughes issued proceedings for a claim for three times the deposit sum on the basis that it had not been protected in accordance with the tenancy deposit regulations. The day before the hearing, Mr Lewis’ solicitors paid the £130 to the bank account of Mr Soens-Hughes solicitors.

This turned out to have been a wise move.  The District Judge dismissed the claim saying

  • there was no deposit that he could make an order about
  • there was no tenancy in existence (as it had ended in May the previous year) in which a tenancy deposit could be paid and could require protection and
  • the words ‘must also’, in s 214(4) of the act meant that the award could not be paid if the deposit had been repaid to the tenant in full, you could only make the award for the penalty if you were also making an award in respect of the deposit itself, and
  • if the Draycott and Tiensia cases are saying that the penalty can be avoided by late protection, then they can also be avoided by late protection

This ‘must also’ wording point is one that was made in a previous case called Green v. Sinclair Investments (report on the Nearly Legal blog) and also covered initially covered on this blog here.

So if this case is right, then the landlord can quite safely fail to protect the  deposit at all, and can avoid the penalty, if challenged,  by returning all of it before the hearing.

Boyle v. Musso

25 October 2010, Bristol County Court

This is a horrendous unlawful eviction case.  I won’t go into the details because you can read them on the Nearly Legal Blog here, but basically Mr Boyle was attacked by his landlord, who was subsequently convicted in the Bristol Magistrates Court of assault occasioning actual bodily harm.  Mr Boyle then brought a civil claim for damages.

Part of this claim was for the tenancy deposit award as, needless to say, the amiable Mr Musso had not protected it nor or repaid any of it.  This claim, I am pleased to say was granted.  It is good to know that there are at least SOME circumstances where the award will be made.

*****

Just reflecting generally on these two cases, one of the differences that stands out is that Ms Lewis was really an innocent party, whereas Mr Musso was not.  It was not Ms Lewis’ fault that her agents failed to protect the deposit, although legally a landlord is liable for the acts of his agent.  However, Mr Musso was clearly a nasty piece of work.

One of the main objections that the Judges have always had to this legislation, is that the penalty was intended to be a strict liability one.  Payable whether or not there was a reasonable excuse for the landlords failure to protect.

So the same award would be payable (as the legislation was intended to operate) both where the landlord had failed to protect because he had to go into hospital for an accident and therefore protected the deposit one day late, and where the landlord failed to protect it at all.

If you want to force Judges to make awards in circumstances where they do not want to make the award, you need to have watertight drafting in your statute.  Clearly this was not the case here, which is why this legislation is now almost unenforceable.

I see that the proposals for the Localism bill amendments include giving the Judges a discretion over the amount of the award that they make, up to a maximum of three times the deposit sum.  I suspect that if this comes into force it is much more likely to succeed, because it is more likely to be supported  by the Judges.

What do you think?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Law case report Tagged With: tenancy deposits

Scroll down for the comments

Landlord Law for Landlords

Are you a landlord, unsure how to manage your properties in these uncertain times?  My Landlord Law service can help you in this crisis by providing online help and guidance and giving you one to one advice in the members' forum area.

>> Find out more about Landlord Law.


IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« Using the High Court Sheriffs for evictions
TRO Confidential : The Case of Cat-woman and the Strange Coincidence »

Comments

  1. David says

    March 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM

    I am not sure we need the strict timetable suggested by the localism bill. This bill will allow some discretion to the judge but the penalty has to be between 1 and 3 times the deposit so there is still no “no penalty” for deserving cases.

    As I read the draft (unless it changed again this week) is that a statutory periodic will be a new deposit protection event. At the very least this would require giving new prescribed information and to what benefit apart from creating another trap for the unwary?

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Choose whether you want to get
>> daily updates or just the
>> weekly roundups

You will also get a FREE Ebook!

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Coronavirus

Landlords and the Coronavirus Emergency – keeping records

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Some of our Other Services:

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2020 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2021 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept