• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

Why your tenancy agreement is misleading – the secret clauses that you don’t know about

June 20, 2012 by Tessa J Shepperson

What does this mean?When a landlord gives a tenant a tenancy agreement – that agreement does not necessarily tell you the whole picture.

There may be whole areas of law which the tenancy agreement does not mention but will nevertheless apply.

There may also be terms written down in the agreement which don’t actually apply to you.

I know – its very confusing. Lets take a closer look

Things that apply whether the tenancy agreement says so or not

Because people’s homes are important, there are a lot of laws and regulations that have been passed to protect tenants.

As these sometimes involve the landlords in expense, there wouldn’t be much point in having them, if landlords could exclude them just by leaving them out of the written tenancy agreement.

So these laws specifically provide that they will apply whether or not they are written down in the tenancy agreement – and even if the landlord and tenant agree between themselves that they will not apply!

Here are the most important laws and regulations which cannot be excluded:

  • The landlords repairing obligations

These are set out in section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. These specifically say that the landlord cannot exclude them if the term of the tenancy is for under seven years.

  • The gas regulations.

These are the regulations under which landlords have to get the appliances inspected and provide a certificate to the tenant

  • The tenancy deposit regulations.

These were amended in April 2012, I have written about them extensively elsewhere on this site.

There are also some ‘common law’ rules which apply. These are not set out in any act, but they are part of the legal rules which have developed over the centuries. Here are a two:

  • The covenant of quiet enjoyment

This is fundamental to a tenancy and is the right for the tenant to be left in peace (it is nothing to do with being noisy or enjoying yourself).

  • Notices to quit.

There are various rules relating to notices to end tenancies which are part of the common law. Some of these have been specifically excluded – for example a landlord cannot and an assured shorthold tenancy by an old style notice to quit.

But a tenant can! And indeed if he wants to end a periodic tenancy, he will have to do this – ie serve a notice on the landlord which complies with the old common law rules (basically that it must be for a complete period and end at the end of the next complete period after service).

Here are some things that may be in a tenancy agreement but which are ‘void’

  • Agreements to exclude the repairing covenants.

 If a landlord puts in his tenancy agreement clauses saying that the tenant must do ALL the repairs to the property and get the gas appliances checked himself – this will, as we saw above, be void.

  • ‘Unfair’ clauses.

There are also regulations, called the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations, which say that if a clause is ‘unfair’ it will be void and unenforceable.

So as an example, if there is a clause which says that the tenant must pay the landlord a penalty payment of £500 for every day the rent is paid late – this will be ‘unfair’ and unenforceable.

  • Inapplicable clauses

Sometimes a clause may not apply simply because it does not apply to the type of tenancy or the property concerned. One obvious example is a clause which provides for the tenant to look after the garden where there is no garden.

Another example is a clause which provides for ‘forfeiture’ of an assured shorthold tenancy – as the Housing Act 1988 specifically says that forfeiture does not apply to ASTs.  We leave these clauses in just in case the tenancy ever loses its AST status (when they may be needed) – but in the meantime they can be highly misleading.

Conclusion

A tenancy agreement is supposed to be a tenants guide to how his tenancy will work.  But under the current system, if he is given a poorly drafted tenancy agreement there may be a whole sheaf of laws and obligations he has no way of finding out about – unless he studies landlord and tenant law.

This is clearly most unsatisfactory.

When the Law Commission published their Renting Homes report in 2006, they recommended, not only that tenancy agreements should be mandatory, but also that there should be a standard prescribed form of tenancy agreement.

Had this come into force it would have been a much more satisfactory state of affairs. The standard tenancy agreement form would have been in plain English, ALL its terms would have been valid, and it would have included information about ALL relavant aspects of the tenancy that the tenant needs to know. It would have made things considerably easier for both landlords and tenants.

In Wales the National Assembly is revisiting the Law Commissions report and are considering implementing them in Wales (see the white paper here pages 34 and 35).

Hopefully this will prompt the government at Westminster to revisit this project also.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: tenancy agreements

Scroll down for the comments

Landlord Law for Landlords

Are you a landlord, unsure how to manage your properties in these uncertain times?  My Landlord Law service can help you in this crisis by providing online help and guidance and giving you one to one advice in the members' forum area.

>> Find out more about Landlord Law.


IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« Moving out after service of a section 21 notice
Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround #63 »

Comments

  1. JS says

    June 22, 2012 at 9:55 AM

    Here’s a clause I often see in Assured Shorthold tenancy agreements that never makes sense to me – the one that goes that if the rent is 14 days or more in arrears the landlord has the right to re-enter the premises and recover possession without prejudice to any other rights.

    Because such a clause cannot possibly be valid by dint of the Protection from Eviction Act and suchlike. So why is it in there, given that being an AST the landlord has the right to regain possession under both s. 8 and s. 21, and that if it were a verbal tenancy, it would not be in there anyhow.

    The only thing I can think of is to send a message to the tenant.

  2. westminster says

    June 22, 2012 at 4:58 PM

    It’s partly because of s.7(6)(b) Housing Act 1988 which provides that the court will not make an order for possession under various grounds in Schedule 2 during a fixed term AST unless the tenancy contract contains a forfeiture clause or similar.

    Even though forfeiture clauses are usually overridden by statute, I believe it is possible for them to operate literally, in very particular circumstances.

  3. Industry Observer says

    June 23, 2012 at 4:27 PM

    It is never possible for forfeiture clauses to operate literally, not in residential tenancies.

    The forfeiture clause is an enabling clause. Where Westminster is correct is that the clause needs to be in an agreement for the Landlord then to be able to rely n s21.

    I tried to take this trouble causing clause (because Landlords think it means immediate possession) out of our agreement years ago but our solicitor told me daft thought it is it had to stay in

  4. Tessa Shepperson says

    June 23, 2012 at 4:48 PM

    You need to have a forfeiture clause which includes reference to the 1988 HA possession grounds:

    – to allow the landlord to use the grounds for possession in schedule 2 of the act during the fixed term and

    – as a precautionary measure just in case the tenancy ever reverts to being a common law one (which technically is always possible albeit unlikely)

    The forfeiture clause must also tell the tenants of their rights under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 or it may be invalid under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.

  5. westminster says

    June 25, 2012 at 8:44 PM

    @Industry Observer
    “The forfeiture clause is an enabling clause. Where Westminster is correct is that the clause needs to be in an agreement for the Landlord then to be able to rely n s21.”
    That is not what I said. I said that forfeiture clauses are necessary in order to use various grounds in Schedule 2 HA1988. These grounds are cited in s.8 notices, not s.21 notices.

    “I tried to take this trouble causing clause (because Landlords think it means immediate possession) out of our agreement years ago but our solicitor told me daft though it is it had to stay in”
    And your solicitor was correct.

  6. JS says

    June 27, 2012 at 3:25 PM

    But even if it becomes a common law tenancy (for instance, if the tenant condition is no longer satisfied) then as it’s over residential property it’s still overridden by s. 3 Protection from Eviction Act and the landlord still has to give a 4-week Notice to Quit?

  7. Tessa Shepperson says

    June 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM

    The Protection from Eviction Act applies, yes. You ‘re-enter’ by obtaining a court order.

    You don’t need to serve a notice to quit to forfeit a lease. But forfeiture can be a bit messy and the tenant has the right to claim relief form forfeiture sometimes even after the order has been made!

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Choose whether you want to get >> all posts or just the >> weekly roundups

You will also get a FREE Ebook!

Featured Tenancy Agreement Post

bespoke tenancy agreement

Our Top Twelve Posts on Tenancy Agreements

More Posts from this Category

Some of our Other Services:

Get Your FREE Ebook

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2020 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2021 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept