• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

Housing law cases – the Judge is sometimes wrong

September 20, 2012 by Tessa J Shepperson

housesFlicking through the August issue of Legal Action Magazine I came across this little case (also reported on Nearly Legal) which supports two of the things I have been saying on this blog.

Namely the need to serve the prescribed information and the date of the ‘last day of a period of the tenancy’.

Although the case relates to a situation from before the tenancy deposit changes in April, these two points are largely unaffected by this.

Lappin v. Surace

Romford County Court – 13 June 2012

In 2009 Ms Surace entered into a tenancy agreement for 12 months with landlord Mr Lappin.  The expiry date of the tenancy was 19 April.

A section 21 notice was served on that date and a tenancy deposit taken.  This was duly protected but the prescribed information was never served on Ms Surace.

After the end of the fixed term, the tenancy ran on as a periodic.  Mr Lappin served two further section 21 notices on the tenant, but expiring on the last day of the month. The reason for this it seems was that the rent was paid on the first day of the month.

Mr Lappin then issued proceedings for possession.

  • At the first hearing:

The Judge made the order saying it did not matter whether Ms Surace knew that the deposit had been protected or not, and that as the rent was paid on the 1st day of the month, the s21 notices were correctly drafted.

Ms Surace appealed to the Judge, HHJ Wulwik.

  • At the appeal hearing

The Judge held that the original s21 notice was invalid as the prescribed information had not been served.

He also found that the subsequent notices (which did not contain any saving clause) were also invalid.  In this case the last day of the period of the tenancy was the 19th day of the month – the fact that Ms Surace paid her rent on a different day did not alter this.

So Ms Surace won her appeal and was entitled to stay in the property.

Lessons for landlords – make sure you serve the prescribed information on your tenants if you take a tenancy deposit, and either have a saving clause in your section 21 notices or make sure you get the date right!

Lessons for us all – if you think the Judge’s decision is wrong, it may be worth appealing.  They do make mistakes sometimes.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: News and comment Tagged With: Eviction, Housing Law, Section 21, Tenancy Deposit

Scroll down for the comments

Landlord Law for Landlords

Are you a landlord, unsure how to manage your properties in these uncertain times?  My Landlord Law service can help you in this crisis by providing online help and guidance and giving you one to one advice in the members' forum area.

>> Find out more about Landlord Law.


IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« Five things to do if you have forgotten to protect the deposit in time
Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround #76 »

Comments

  1. Industry Observer says

    September 20, 2012 at 4:43 PM

    First Judge obviously wrong on count 1 correct on count 2

    Second Judge correct on count 1 wrong on count 2

    Except there was no saving clause had there been I suspect he would have commented differently on the s21 dates.

    There is still no definitive answer on this issue of is it the Rent Due Date that dictates a period of the tenancy or the Anniversary Date of the agreement being terminated?

    This as far as I am aware ws not an actual Appeal Court decision – can’t be as only one Judge – more an Appeal to a Circuit Judge to correct an error by a District Judge?

    Sadly we are no further forward and you could go to Court with Judge A and method A one day and either get an order or be thrown out, and go to Judge B with methos B the next day and get the same outcome.

    It’s ‘just another’ case in a Lower Court – isn’t it?

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Landlord Law Virtual Conference 2021

Make sure you and your staff are fully up to date with the law – remember the only 100% protection against penalties and fines is 100% compliance!

Our virtual Conference has expert legal speakers and the recordings will be available for 3 months after the event.

Click here to find out more

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Choose whether you want to get
>> daily updates or just the
>> weekly roundups

You will also get a FREE Ebook!

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Coronavirus

Landlords and the Coronavirus Emergency – keeping records

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2020 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2021 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept