• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Selling off council houses under the right to buy is wrong – discuss

January 14, 2014 by Tessa J Shepperson

Buy to letDid you see this article from the Observer about landlords ‘cashing in’ on the right to buy over the weekend?

It is based on a report, From Right to Buy to Buy to Let, compiled by Tom Copley, a Labour London assembly member, from responses to freedom of information requests.

This shows that:

  • at least 36% of all homes sold by councils across London under the buy to let law are now let by private landlords
  • substantial numbers of these are being let to tenants who are now supported by housing benefit, while
  • many would-be council tenants have now been forced into the private rented sector because of the dwindling supply of council homes

The result of this is that we, the taxpayers, have paid and are paying, several times over.

  • We paid for the original properties to be built
  • We therefore effectively subsidised the council house tenants who bought them at an undervalue,
  • We (or rather the public sector) no longer gets the benefit of rent from the properties which our taxes helped to build, and
  • Now we are paying, through housing benefit, higher rents to private landlords.

The report says that families on benefit claim claim as much as £100 a week – £5,200 a year – more in housing benefit than council tenants in the same area.  Goodness knows how much money has been lost to the taxpayer through this exercise.

Let me come right out into the open here. I don’t agree with selling off publicly owned residential property to the private sector. I never have done.

I don’t blame council tenants for buying the properties when they were offered to them – I would probably have done the same in their place.

I don’t blame buy to let landlords for buying them from the original owners and renting them out at a market rent. Thats business, and they are at least making accommodation available for people.

But please explain to me why it is fair and right that someone lucky enough to have subsidised council housing in the first place, should then be given the opportunity to buy this property at an undervalue. Often a massive undervalue.  When everyone else has to pay full price.

And why it is right that property built with OUR MONEY should be sold off at an undervalue and taken forever out of the public sector. With no funding being made available to councils to build new houses to replace those sold.

Leaving councils with a statutory duty to house the homeless in priority need, but nowhere to put them.

The report is written with particular reference to London (Tom Copley being a London Assembly member) and London has perhaps has suffered the most and has the biggest housing problems.  As the report says

If there is insufficient housing for those on low-incomes – the key workers that keep the city ticking – it will undermine London’s long-term economic competitiveness.

These are the recommendations made in the report:

  • The government should introduce mandatory covenants on all Right to Buy properties that stipulate that the home cannot be let through the private rented sector
  • The system of discounts should be abolished
  • A new system should be introduced whereby local authorities retain an equity stake in any home sold
  • Local authorities should have a ‘right not to sell’ council housing if this can be justified
  • Newly built council housing should be exempted from the Right to Buy if the borough wishes them to be
  • Local authorities should have a right of first refusal to buy the former council property before the owner seeks to sell it on the open market
  • All new homes built through Right to Buy receipts should mirror the rent, size and tenure specifications of the home lost by the council through this policy
  • Local authorities should only be allowed to sell the leasehold of a property and not the freehold.

This all sounds fairly sensible to me.  What do you think?

You can read the report online here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: News and comment Tagged With: local authority powers, Right To Buy

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« Landlord Law Conference Exhibitors – Envirovent #lllconf
Should my landlord refund advance rent paid now I've moved out? »

Comments

  1. Richard Watters says

    January 14, 2014 at 8:36 AM

    Hard to argue with the financial logic in the report.

    Of course, Right to Buy was introduced by Maggie and gave ordinary working people the opportunity of home ownership for the first time.

    It helped create a culture of people working hard and investing for the future, for the benefit of their families, at a time when the UK was an economic basket case.

    The principle was right. Of course at the time no-one could look 30 years into the future and see the issues raised in Tom Copley’s report.

  2. Jamie says

    January 14, 2014 at 10:18 AM

    There is nothing to discuss. The Right to Buy policy/legislation shoudl never have been introduced. The private sector was never going to be able to supply the number of new homes needed to keep up with the demand of social tenants, let alone make up for the homes that were sold.

    In Scotland they have already introduced a bill to reverse the legislation (although it also contains some other policies I don’t really agree with).

  3. HB Welcome says

    January 14, 2014 at 12:49 PM

    The ‘report’ conveniently fails to take into account repairs, maintenance, management charges, insurance etc of the older social housing stock.

  4. HB Welcome says

    January 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM

    Also when making the ‘benefit tenants claiming up to £100 a week more’ comparisons with council tenants, it overlooks that council rents are heavily subsidised.

    And it doesn’t take into account pricing of properties under secure tenancies.

    Or the inefficiency of councils when it comes to spending OPM.

    There is much wrong with RTB but this one sided report ignoring major aspects is a bit of a nonsense.

  5. Dave Griffith says

    January 14, 2014 at 3:33 PM

    RTB is not the cause of the housing shortage in the SE of England that is due to governments allowing the population to increase rapidly without building the houses needed to accommodate the extra people.

  6. ian says

    January 14, 2014 at 5:34 PM

    I think the problem was that rents in the public sector where (and still are) far too low. So there is no incentive for someone renting in the public sector to move on when they are able to do so.

    A case could be made for public sector rents being set higher than the private sector, as tenants in the public sector gets more rights.

    If the rent levels were not so low, the discounts would not have had to be so big and if the money was then spend on building new public sector housing we could had ended up with mixed estates and still had enough homes.

  7. Julia Kouba says

    January 14, 2014 at 5:57 PM

    Ignoring the legal requirement that Councils have to house people, I presume Councils sold their Council houses for more than they paid for them and generated a capital gain. If a landlord did this, they would have to pay CGT on these funds but Councils don’t. Councils (or their ALMOs) then could access super-cheap funding via Housing Corporation (as was then) if they wanted to build new more efficient or smaller homes. My heart is not bleeding for these Councils as Private Rented Sector (PRS) landlords would jump for joy to have access to near-free money and tax-free capital gains!!

    Unfortunately, Councils are not run on a commercial basis and don’t understand basic treasury, capital and asset management. They squandered these amazing tax-free gains and cheap funding. Parking London, why are Councils not buying back the housing stock from distressed sellers? They could easily set up a commercial vehicle for doing this and make greater returns than PRS. Far better to do this than constantly moan about Right to Buy!!!

  8. Jamie says

    January 15, 2014 at 10:27 AM

    The basic idea of tenants owning their council homes was originally from labour and councils always had the right to sell homes to tenants, it just happened very rarely. The idea was then adopted by Cutler via his General Sales Scheme which later evolved into the Right To Buy policy when he headed the Housing Committee of the GLC. It didn’t come from Thatcher, although she promoted it.

    Julia, the idea wasn’t that councils should use the windfall to buy shiney new social housing. Quite the opposite. It was a much more
    ideological policy to specifically move away from the idea that housingshould be provided by the state and towards a free market.

    Back then a lot of social housing stock was empty and sub-standard so it did’t seem like such a bad idea. The problem is that I believe social housing is fundamentally one of the rare things that government can provide better than free markets than.

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Sign up to our
>> daily updates

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Tessa Shepperson

Why you need and how to get proper legal advice on landlord and tenant issues

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept