• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

This tenant has served a notice to quit but now wants to stay – can he do this?

September 11, 2014 by Tessa J Shepperson

HouseHere we have a question to the blog clinic from Derek (not his real name) who is a landlord:

My letting agent has received valid notice to quit from our tenant (periodic tenancy). The agent has confirmed acceptance in writing.

The tenant is buying a property but now at the last minute wants to stay longer because the purchase is delayed.

Having made maintenance and holiday arrangements around the original notice date I want to hold the tenant to it.

I’ve read that that a tenants valid notice always ends the existing tenancy and it then requires the landlords consent to offer a new tenancy and that if the tenant holds over they will be trespassing. The agent tells me this is not the case in law.

My letting agent tells me that the tenants notice is not binding and that the tenant can withdraw the original notice and submit a new written notice to get the one month extension requested by the tenant. They cite the 1988 Housing Act in support of their position, and say that the existing tenancy agreement just carries on until the tenant vacates?

Yes, the tenant would most likely pay the rent and be gone before a section 21 could come into effect so I realise that despite the inconvenience, it’s probably a case of ‘live with it”.

However I want to know whether the agent has advised me correctly as to the exact legal position (as opposed to what is pragmatic and easy for them in the circumstances)?

Is the original valid notice to quit binding on the tenant? Can the tenant withdraw and replace it unilaterally as the agent suggests?

Answer

My understanding is that if the tenant serves a proper notice to quit, then that will end the tenancy. I am not aware of any rules saying that it can be retracted.  (Although you can resurrect the tenancy by accepting rent without qualifying that it is accepted as ‘mesne profits‘.)

So if you act in reliance on the Notice to Quit and suffer loss when he fails to leave, it is arguable that you should be entitled to compensation.

There is also the very old rule in the Distress for Rent Act 1737 which I discuss here which says that where a tenant gives notice to quit but then fails to move out, the landlord is entitled to charge double rent.

I suggest you draw your tenants’ attention to this.

So far as bringing proceedings for eviction is concerned, yes, they will be long gone before you could make much headway.

Although the notice to quit ends the tenancy, strangely we do not use the quicker ‘squatters’ procedure designed for trespassers in this situation, but the standard procedure as used for tenants.

Its a bit odd I know but there you are, thats the legal system for you.

So the double rent option fills the gap rather nicely.

Adrian Thompson of the Guild of Landlords confirmed in a comment to this post that he has used it and it has been used many times by the members of his site.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Readers problems Tagged With: Tenants Notice

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« What can this tenant do if he wants to keep his bikes indoors?
Setting up the payments facility »

Comments

  1. Jamie says

    September 11, 2014 at 10:50 AM

    We’re just starting this process with a tenant at the moment. We have just put them on notice of intended action and made it clear about the acceptance of payment as mesne profits (for the uninitiated, it’s pronounced ‘mean’ profits).

    Hopefully he’ll leave before it gets to court action.

  2. Lawcruncher says

    September 11, 2014 at 12:41 PM

    I agree with Tessa. Googling fails to reveal any authority to confirm the position, but there are many sites which agree and I found none which disagree. It really has to be the case or otherwise the landlord would not know where he stood.

    I think it is important that no landlord acting without legal advice should accept or demand payment for any period after the notice expires designating it “mesne profits” because it is not difficult to get it wrong. The safest policy, even where lawyers are involved, is not to accept or demand any payment and to restrict any claims for mesne profits to court papers.

  3. Jamie says

    September 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM

    It’s quite straightforward really, provided one makes it clear – in writing of course – that payments are accepted not as rent but as mesne profits based on a daily rate as compensation for occupation of the property beyond the lawful end of the tenancy and that by accepting payments there is no intention to create a new tenancy.

    This should satisfy any district judge and we’ve never had it challenged.

    Although of course, as with anything to do with landlord and tenant law, if in doubt seek specialist advice.

  4. Lawcruncher says

    September 17, 2014 at 10:47 PM

    So obviously you do not claim for any period in advance.

  5. Jamie says

    September 18, 2014 at 9:26 AM

    Are you referring to the fact that if rent is paid in advance by say Direct Debit and that when it turns up in the account a tenancy has already been created?

  6. Jamie says

    September 18, 2014 at 11:45 AM

    Or that if you’re demanding or accepting it in advance it’s possible to be interpreted as rent?

  7. Lawcruncher says

    September 18, 2014 at 8:07 PM

    I am no expert on the finer points of the law here since I was never a litigator. However, as I understand it, mesne profits are compensation for occupation where the occupier has no right to be in occupation. No one is entitled to compensation for something which may happen, only for what has happened. So, whilst you can demand mesne profits for past occupation, if you demand it for future occupation you are anticipating continuing occupation and effectively condoning it. If you condone it the occupier is in occupation with your consent and if there is (exclusive) occupation with consent and money changes hands you have a tenancy unless it is one of the recognised exceptions which distinguish a tenancy from other forms of occupation with consent.

    Claiming in proceedings for possession is different because the claim for mesne profits is (or ought to be) general.

    Since it is easy to get it wrong the best advice for a landlord who wants to maintain that a tenancy has come or will come to an end is either (a) not to accept or demand money in respect of any period after the tenancy ends or (b) to take specialist advice on precisely what he can and cannot do.

  8. Jamie says

    September 24, 2014 at 10:58 AM

    It is the Law of Property Act which implies that an interest in land is created in the absence of a written contract where rent is accepted.

    By accepting a tenant’s notice, persuing court action and specifically stating the payments are mesne profits and there is no intention to create a tenancy, I don’t see how a judge could interpret that at as a periodic tenancy.

  9. Lawcruncher says

    September 27, 2014 at 9:49 AM

    What is important here is not so much an expressed intention, but rather what intention is to be inferred from the conduct of the parties. If everything points to a new tenancy having arisen calling any money the landlord received mesne profits will not help. Mesne profits are damages for trespass for the period of unauthorised occupation. Is it not for the court to decide what the damages are?

    The very basic point here is that where someone is in exclusive occupation and pays money for it a landowner needs to come up with a good explanation for why there is no tenancy if the point is contested.

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Sign up to our
>> daily updates

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Tessa Shepperson

Why you need and how to get proper legal advice on landlord and tenant issues

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept