• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

Who decides whether a new fixed term is given to the tenant – the landlord or the agent?

March 12, 2015 by Tessa J Shepperson

top floor flatHere is a question to the blog clinic from Esther who is a landlord

I use a managing agent. My tenants have had a 12 month contract but wanted to stay on after this period ended. The managing agent wanted to renew with a new 12 month contract (cost £150 split between myself & tenant) and increase rent by £25 pm.

Through email the tenants said they couldn’t afford the increase. On the phone, I explained to the managing agent I was happy to maintain the current rent and roll onto a periodic tenancy as they have been very good tenants. The agent said he would arrange this.

The tenants have continued to pay rent (and I presumed it was on our new agreement).

The managing agents are now pressing for a new 12 month contract and asking for £75 from me. Where do I stand?

Answer

In a landlord / agent situation YOU are the customer and THEY are just your agents. YOU are the one who tells THEM what to do – not vice versa!

Its YOUR property not theirs.

The reason why the agent wants the new fixed term of course, is that they want paying! However this does not justify forcing you into a new fixed term which neither you nor the tenants want.

On the other hand, it is not unreasonable for them to have some sort of payment, assuming of course that they are doing some sort of work.  Although if they are managing agents they must surely be getting some sort of commission for their management work?

If they are not doing anything, you may want to consider sacking them and dealing with the management on your own.

In any event I suggest you take a look at your agency agreement and see what you have actually agreed with them regarding renewals, payment and termination of the agreement.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Roundup of posts Tagged With: Agents

Scroll down for the comments

Landlord Law for Landlords

Are you a landlord, unsure how to manage your properties in these uncertain times?  My Landlord Law service can help you in this crisis by providing online help and guidance and giving you one to one advice in the members' forum area.

>> Find out more about Landlord Law.


IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« Easy Law Training to open up in the South
Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround #195 »

Comments

  1. Industry Observer says

    March 12, 2015 at 3:19 PM

    Not 100% clear whether this is a TFO just because the word “management” is mentioned?

  2. Jamie says

    March 13, 2015 at 11:47 AM

    “If they are not doing anything, you may want to consider sacking them and dealing with the management on your own.”

    They don’t sound like they’re very good agents, but whether the landlord wants to go completely on their own will depend on several factors.

    Does the landlord collect the rent and pay service charges and ground rents directly?
    Does the landlord know the difference between renewing and going periodic and the legal implications?
    Do they understand deposit schemes and prescribed information?
    Do they want the responsibility of contacting the tenant directly?
    What about dealing with everything at the end of the tenancy?
    Are they happy to deal with any maintenance?
    Do they understand each party’s legal rights and obligations?

    We only offer fully managed services so we don’t have this problem of charging for renewals. For some tenancies we may not have much work to do during the term apart from collect the rent, but for others there may be so much effort involved that we make a loss on the management fees. It’s the old Pareto’s 80:20 principle.

  3. Jon Deadman says

    March 13, 2015 at 12:46 PM

    ‘In a landlord / agent situation YOU are the customer and THEY are just your agents. YOU are the one who tells THEM what to do – not vice versa!’

    What happens when a landlord gives their agent an instruction that is wrong? Not necessarily an unlawful instruction but one that is in breach of tenancy terms.

    For example, we recently had a landlord tell us that he is prepared to breach tenancy terms by failing to fix the cooker that was supplied as part of the tenancy because the property has been sold and they are just waiting for completion. In addition he doesn’t particularly like the tenant and feels their lifestyle (which routine visits have shown is a little chaotic) is a contributing factor to the oven element not working.

    Not very good reasons in our opinion, and one that may possibly jeopardise the sale of his house if the tenant were to fail to vacate or cause malicious damage out of spite.

    But how should the agent act in this situation? Do they have to defend their landlord actions as part of their duty to their client?
    Or, pragmatically, can the Agent use their apparent authority to instruct the work and pay the invoice from the tenants next rental payment, even the client has told them not to go ahead with the works

  4. Tessa Shepperson says

    March 13, 2015 at 1:29 PM

    @Jon That is a very interesting point! If you feel that your landlord is asking you to do something which you consider you are not able to do, you need to discuss this with them. If you feel strongly about it, the only real solution is to tell them that you are not prepared to act as their agent any more if they continue with their instructions.

    For example if they are asking you to do something which will affect your professional reputation or which could make your company liable – for example under the Redress Schemes.

    However, if you go ahead any get work done under your ‘apparent authority’ in breach of the clients express instructions he may have grounds for refusing to cover the cost (which would mean it would be bourne by your company). I suggest that if this situation arises you take a careful look at your agency terms and conditions and see what they say about this.

  5. Rent Rebel says

    March 15, 2015 at 9:26 PM

    @Jon, that’s an interesting dilemma.

    Letting agents always have two clients, of course and in a situation like that – where the landlord shows such wanton disregard for their obligation – I think any sound letting agent shoud be upfront with the tenant and let them decide next moves. Maybe they are happy to repair it themselves and deduct rent accordingly.

    I do hope the tenant puts it in writing, if they haven’t already – giving you now 14 days to outline your “adequate response”. Stories like this are just another reminder of the dichotomy of landlords and their “business”.

  6. Jamie says

    March 16, 2015 at 10:13 AM

    @ Rent Rebel. Just to clarify, an agent most definitely only has one client – the landlord – but we owe a duty of care to our tenants. There is a significant legal and practical difference.

    We experience problems similar to Jon’s, but our issues are with tenancy deposit disputes.

    Even though we use independent clerks and we are as reasonable and as objective as possible, some landlords will simply insist on making unreasonable claims. In these situations we have no option but to raise a dispute with the TDS ourselves. But even then we are expected to put the case for the landlord even if we don’t agree with it. This makes us look bad and we lose part of our ‘no claim discount’ through no fault of our own which can push up our TDS fee significantly.

    We cannot really disinstruct ourselves in these circumstances and in any case we want to remain involved out of a duty of care to the tenant.

  7. Rent Rebel says

    March 16, 2015 at 3:37 PM

    Jamie – just to clarify, I know how it stands legally. Your contract is with the landlord, sure. But letting agents – in reality – have two clients; and will happily charge both of them, while only serving the interests of one.

    That’s (one of many reasons) why I dislike letting agents so much, and never use them. What duty of care to the tenant are you fulfilling here? I see the opposite.

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Landlord Law Virtual Conference 2021

Make sure you and your staff are fully up to date with the law – remember the only 100% protection against penalties and fines is 100% compliance!

Our virtual Conference has expert legal speakers and the recordings will be available for 3 months after the event.

Click here to find out more

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Choose whether you want to get
>> daily updates or just the
>> weekly roundups

You will also get a FREE Ebook!

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Coronavirus

Landlords and the Coronavirus Emergency – keeping records

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2020 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2021 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept