• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

New nightmares for landlords using High Court Sheriffs to evict tenants

November 17, 2015 by Tessa J Shepperson

Using the sheriffsI used to periodically get rung up by a nice man from one of the High Court Sheriff firms telling me how they did a much better job than the bailiffs.

“We can get you an appointment within 24 hours” he would tell me.

“Yes” I would reply, “I’m sure you can, but what about the time it takes getting the case transferred to the High Court and issuing the Writ?”

At that stage he would go a bit quiet.

What am I talking about?

Physically evicting tenants

When you get an order for possession, that is not the end of the line. It is still perfectly legal for the tenant to stay put and thumb their nose at you.

What you need to do then is get a court official to actually go round and physically move them out.

Normally these will be the County Court bailiffs. They are staff working for the County Courts who are legally authorised to do this work, provided you have your possession order and have made the application in the correct way and paid the fee.

The trouble is, in some of the busier courts, it can take you a very long time to get a bailiffs appointment – up to eight weeks or more sometimes.

This is very frustrating for landlords who are stuck with tenants who are not paying rent and not surprisingly they look around for a quicker option.

Enter the High Court Sheriffs. Or High Court Enforcement Officers (HCEOs) as is their official name now.

The High Court and the County Court

In our legal system, we have two courts. The High Court and the County Court.

  • The County Court deals with most ‘ordinary’ claims, including virtually all possession claims. Although there are a lot of court buildings (albeit the number is shrinking) they are all part of the same ‘court’.
  • The High Court (which is actually a complex of courts) deals with the higher value claims and also has a supervisory jurisdiction over all lower courts and tribunals.

Both courts have their own enforcement officers

The Court Enforcement Officers

  • The County Court Bailiffs are employed by the County Courts. They are therefore often under a lot of pressure due to cuts in court funding.
  • The High Court Sheriffs / High Court Enforcement Officers are authorised by the Court but are not employed by them.

The Sheriffs’ fees, therefore relate to the work that they do. Which means they have more incentive to do a good job.

They also have greater powers, one of which is that they do not have to give notice before taking action. Obstructing a Sheriff is also contempt of court which can result in arrest.

Both officers exist to enforce orders within their own court, so if you want an HCEO to enforce your County Court Order you have to follow the proper procedure.

Enforcing possession orders in the High Court

If you want the Sheriffs to enforce your possession order, ‘leave’ must first be obtained first from the County Court, under Section 42(2) County Courts Act 1984.

You can apply for this on the claim form or it can also be done after the possession order is made – in which case technically it does not need not be on notice – so you can apply to the County Court for leave without the tenant knowing anything about it.

Don’t expect your Judge to grant permission automatically though – many will refuse unless you give them a compelling reason why this should be done.

For example, one reason that could be persuasive is that there is a ten-week wait for a bailiffs appointment in that court and you urgently need to exchange contracts for the sale of your property.

However, even if you pass this hurdle and the County Court Judge agrees to your request, this is not, as pointed out by Nearly Legal recently, the end of it.  (See also Giles Peakers post here)

You then need to issue a High Court Writ – and for this you need to have permission from the High Court.

The law here changed last year and under CPR 83.13, the occupier (the ‘occupier’ mind, not just the tenant) must have notice of your application.

This is so that the occupier has the chance to apply to the court ‘for any relief to which the occupant may be entitled’. As illustrated by a recent case.

Nicholas v Secretary of State for Defence, High Court, Chancery Division, August 24, 2015

Here, Mrs Nicholas, who was in the process of challenging an order for possession which had been made in proceedings brought against her by her landlord, woke up one morning to find the Sheriffs in her home having entered and changed the locks.

Needless to say, she applied to the court to set the writ aside.

The court agreed with her, holding that if no notice is given to the occupier (as required by CPR r.83.13(8)), this is a sufficient basis to set aside the Writ of Possession after it has been executed. Which they duly did in this case.

(The case is not on Bailii but there is an Arden Chambers report)

Getting the procedure wrong

The Nearly Legal post also points out that some enforcement agencies are regularly issuing writs without getting proper permission first.

Unless the possession order is made against trespasses (and a few other exceptions) enforcement of a possession order by the Sheriffs via a writ of possession MUST involve notice of the application for the writ being given to the tenant/occupant.

The Judge will need to be satisfied that it was actually served on the actual occupier.

Conclusion

So the much vaunted ‘quick Sheriff eviction procedure’ turns out to be a hornets nest and, I would suggest, something to be avoided by DIY landlords.

If you do want to give it a go – make sure you use a firm of solicitors. Solicitors all carry professional indemnity insurance so if they get the procedure wrong and you end up getting sued for illegal eviction, you can pass the bill on to them.

There is also the question of whether it is right for there to be such hurdles placed before landlords who after all are only trying to enforce their legal rights.  Why SHOULD they be forced to house non-paying tenants for free?

Landlords who run large properties portfolios as a business can no doubt cover these costs (although I question whether it is right that any private landlord should have to do this) but it is very hard on, say, pensioners who rely on the rent from a property as their main income.

I know that the question of sheriff enforcement is something that Landlord Action have campaigned on. Are the landlord associations also doing something about it?


NB Landlords can purchase legal expenses insurance to help with the costs involved with evicting tenants.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Law case report

Scroll down for the comments

Landlord Law for Landlords

Are you a landlord, unsure how to manage your properties in these uncertain times?  My Landlord Law service can help you in this crisis by providing online help and guidance and giving you one to one advice in the members' forum area.

>> Find out more about Landlord Law.


IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« What is different about the tenancy deposit schemes?
Calling all Welsh Landlords and Letting Agents – the day of Smart Renting approaches … »

Comments

  1. Ian says

    November 17, 2015 at 4:04 PM

    This give yet anther reasons never to rent to anyone that is not in full time employment, as the costs and lost rent would never be recovered from a LHA tenant!

    A real shame, as LHA tenants are then forced into the hands of landlords with properties that on one else will rent.

    (The landlord associations seem to be of little use on campaigning.)

  2. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    November 18, 2015 at 8:02 AM

    Ian it is my understanding that high court bailiffs can also seize ‘goods to the value of’ when evicting under a high court order which county court bailiffs cant, so there would actually be a better chance of recovery.

    Mind you I’ve met a few of these recovery people and always felt like I wanted a bath afterwards

    • Ivan says

      November 18, 2015 at 10:57 AM

      I believe they are bound by strict regulations when seizing goods in residential properties.

      Such as no white goods, not personal goods, must leave TV if it is the only one etc.

      Often they don’t bother as the storage etc costs more than what they can in theory seize.

      • Tessa Shepperson says

        November 18, 2015 at 11:01 AM

        That is a very important point.

        The money to pay off your CCJ is obtained from the sale price at auction and frequently the costs of storage exceed the sale price.

        So landlords really only ought to go for seizure of goods if they are sure either that the value of the goods justify it or if they believe the tenant will pay up to prevent this happening.

        Plus, as you say, there are strict rules as to what they can seize. ‘Tools of the debtors trade’ are also I think excluded.

  3. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    November 18, 2015 at 1:20 PM

    I know bailiffs are bound by such rules but I wonder if high court officers are. athough they do sub contract the work out. The company featured in the TV series “Cant pay, we’ll take it away’ also do high court writs.

    The storage issue is an interesting one.Many councils are bedogged by illegal advertising hoardings which is a breach prosecuted by planning departments but often they are left up regardless, because while a council is entitled by law to remove them they cannot destroy them so have to store them at their own expense, thats if they have the storage space for them in the first place which most dont.

    One of those daft gaps in the law

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Landlord Law Virtual Conference 2021

Make sure you and your staff are fully up to date with the law – remember the only 100% protection against penalties and fines is 100% compliance!

Our virtual Conference has expert legal speakers and the recordings will be available for 3 months after the event.

Click here to find out more

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Choose whether you want to get
>> daily updates or just the
>> weekly roundups

You will also get a FREE Ebook!

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Coronavirus

Landlords and the Coronavirus Emergency – keeping records

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2020 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2021 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept