• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Three Myths and Misconceptions about rent to rent

September 15, 2016 by Tessa J Shepperson

Rent to rentDespite the disapproval of many lawyers, it seems that the enthusiasm for rent to rent arrangements continues.

This is where the owner of the property lets it to someone else, not to live in for their home but so they can sublet it out to others.

The attraction of this is that the tenant/landlord does all the hard work in renting out and managing the property and you just sit back and collect the money. But it does not always work out like that.

In this post, I am going to take a look at three myths and misconceptions.

1. The agreement is an AST

Here I am talking about the agreement between the owner of the property (often described by lawyers as the ‘head lessor’ and the tenant who then sublets out.

As the tenant is not going to be living in the property as his or her home, this CANNOT be an AST.

In fact it will not be a residential tenancy at all. It will be a commercial or business tenancy.

2. The agreements are licenses

These are the agreements between the tenant and the sub-tenants.

In most circumstances, these will be ordinary ASTs. If the properties are let out to people who have ‘exclusive occupation’ of the property or their own room, then this will be automatic. The fact that it is a sub-tenancy does not change anything.

As was laid down in the case of Street v, Mountford in 1985, you cannot turn a tenancy into a license by getting the occupier to sign a piece of paper saying this.

That is not to say that it is impossible for the occupiers to have licenses. It isn’t.

However. it’s not straightforward, and many landlords have tried to evict people on the basis that they are licensees only to have their case chucked out by the Judge on the basis that they are tenants and the landlord has used the wrong eviction procedure.

3. The sub-tenants / licensees can be evicted without having to get a court order.

This is a common misconception, and is the main reason why many landlords are so keen for occupiers to be licensees rather than tenants.

However under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977, evicting a residential occupier without a court order for possession is a criminal offence, and a civil wrong entitling the occupier to claim damages.

This applies even if the occupier has a license rather than a tenancy.

There are a few circumstances where a court order is not necessary but these will not normally apply in rent to rent situations – they include

  • Lodgers
  • Holiday lets, and situations where
  • No rent (or equivalent) is paid

In conclusion

Rent to rent can work, and sometimes work well, but often there are big problems. It is not something to be entered into lightly and if you are considering this, you are strongly advised to take legal advice first.

For example, once you have let out the property on this basis, you have no control over what your tenant does with it.

If the tenant (as many do) sub divides the property up and rents it out to several sharers, this will turn the property into an HMO and there may be problems if it does not have a license or (in some cases) proper planning permission.

If you just don’t want to be bothered with the management of your property, it is probably better to put it in the hands of a really good letting agent – preferably one regulated by RICS or ARLA.  They will look after things for you but you will not lose control in the way that you do with rent to rent.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: News and comment

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« Is this landlord obliged to re-wire the outbuilding?
Tessa Shepperson standing in for Ben Newsround #3 »

Comments

  1. Lawcruncher says

    September 15, 2016 at 9:16 AM

    Just for the record, I think it should be emphasised that the tenancy granted by the owner will not be a business tenancy within Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.

    • Jon says

      September 18, 2016 at 9:50 PM

      Common law tenancy then?

  2. HB Welcome says

    September 15, 2016 at 9:21 AM

    This is how I am seeing it done (don’t do it myself);

    Landlord with a large rental property carefully selects a Patsy.
    A live in Rigsby to live there at a reduced rate or for some other favour.
    Ostensibly lets the whole property to them, fills the property with lodgers, and the real landlord turns up on rent day and collects the rent from everyone (via the Patsy if they want to abide by the niceties).

  3. Industry Observer says

    September 19, 2016 at 1:00 PM

    @HB Welcome

    Nice to see the usual tripe from you what on earth makes you think the Landlord is in on it? I probably get at least 3 enquiries a month where Rent2Rent is involved, I have yet to come across a case where the landlord was anything but the innocent victim. Why would a Landlord on a flat especially want to risk such a set up?

    The problem is usually the ‘tenant’ taking the property does not live there – rendering the AST granted to them invalid.

    Best solution for a victim Landlord is tell the ‘tenant’ who will not have done the RTR checks that he has committed a criminal offence and the Home Office will be informed.

  4. HB Welcome says

    October 3, 2016 at 11:28 PM

    @IO,

    Charming!

    But to answer your question-

    “what on earth makes you think the Landlord is in on it?”

    Because I know landlords doing it. I live and work amongst it.

    “The problem is usually the ‘tenant’ taking the property does not live there”

    Of course it is, the article makes that very clear.

    I was publicising a possibly lesser known angle to this that people may be unaware of.

    -Any apology graciously accepted.

  5. Jon says

    October 4, 2016 at 7:23 PM

    Still confused as to what type of tenancy it would be between the head and intermediate landlords. Not an AST that’s clear. Company let? Tenancy under part 2 L&T Act 1954?

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Sign up to our
>> daily updates

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Tessa Shepperson

Why you need and how to get proper legal advice on landlord and tenant issues

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept