• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Letting agents fees and transparency – a new case

November 2, 2016 by Tessa J Shepperson

JudgeFoxtons v. LB Camden, First Tier Tribunal,10 October 2016

This is an important decision where Foxtons appealed against four final penalty notices served on them by Camden LB  in respect of four offices and the Foxtons website.

The law and regulations concerned are set out in detail in the decision report (you can see a pdf of this here) but the reason Camden served the notices was the fact that Foxtons listed among their fees, an ‘Administration fee’ of £420.

The regulations state that fees must be set out in detail so that people know what they are paying for and the guidance notes say “Ill-defined terms such as administration cost must not be used.”

Foxtons pointed out that this is just guidance and said that their fee covered a variety of items which would vary from property to property so ‘Administration fee’ was an appropriate way to describe this. However, they then decided to amend the wording to include the following description:

Administration fee £420

This is a fixed cost fee that can cover a variety of works depending on the individual circumstances of each tenancy, including but not limited to conducting viewings, negotiating the tenancy, verifying references and drawing up contracts. This charge is applicable per tenancy, and not per individual tenant.

Camden were still unhappy with this though, believing that all the charges should be listed in detail.  The description provided by Foxtons is inadequate as it potentially includes items which are not specifically set out in it.

Foxtons therefore challenged the notice at the First Tier Tribunal.

The First Tier Tribunal Decision

The Judge, Peter Lane, ruled that the first description was inadequate. Fees cannot be described as just ‘administration fees’.

However, he felt that the amended wording was sufficient to comply with the rules, saying:

I agree with Foxtons that Camden incorrectly interpreted the legislation (and, for that matter, the Guidance), insofar as Camden considered that the use of the expression “Administration Charge” or “Administration Fee” was prohibited. There is nothing wrong per se with the use of such a label, provided that it is accompanied by “a description … that is sufficient to enable a person … to understand the service or cost that is covered by the fee or the purpose for which it is imposed”.

It is in this light that the Primary Authority Advice, regarding “vague expressions like ‘admin fee’”, must be understood.

The Judge, therefore, ordered that the penalty should be reduced from £5,000 per notice to £3,000 to take account of the fact that a satisfactory description of the charge was given from March 2016.

Points to note

Camden are not happy with this decision and I understand will be looking to appeal this case further.

In the meantime David Cox of ARLA is recommending that agents do not use the words ‘Administration fee’ when describing their fees at all.

“The Government guidance and our own Primary Authority Assured Advice said not to use the word, which is why when we created the ARLA Fees Template, we suggested using terms like ‘Tenancy Set-Up Fee’ together with a full and clear explanation of what services are provided for the fee.”*

*As reported here.  It will be interesting to see what happens on appeal.

NB I just visited the Foxtons site and could not find a list of landlord fees at all as their link did not work.  The pdf (when available) is also several clicks away from the home page.

Note – the picture is not intended to be an accurate representation of Judge Peter Lane deciding the case!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Law case report Tagged With: Agents Fees

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« Letting agents renewal charges to the landlord
Tenant penalties for breaching tenancy rules – unauthorised subletting »

Comments

  1. Romain says

    November 2, 2016 at 8:48 AM

    I am flabbergasted that so much trouble is created because of the term ‘admin fee’. What is Camden Council trying to achieve?

    The term is unimportant. There is not even a requirement to label fees. The Consumers Rights Act is clear that what is required and important is to describe fees.

  2. David says

    November 3, 2016 at 3:21 PM

    It is ABSOLUTELY right that Camden go after them.

    Letting Agents screw Landlord and Tenant alike, often charging BOTH parties for the same thing.

    As far as I am concerned all fees should be made to the Landlord as a tax deductible expense.

    Many Many letting agents are taking the piss and abusing tenants with these exorbitant fees, most of which they make up as they go along.

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Sign up to our
>> daily updates

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Tessa Shepperson

Why you need and how to get proper legal advice on landlord and tenant issues

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept