• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

Is a clause requiring a tenant to pay council tax unfair?

February 2, 2017 by Tessa Shepperson

HousesI did my tenancy agreements workshop yesterday and an interesting point was raised by one of the delegates.

It was following on from a discussion about Leeds City Council v Broadley, reported by Nearly Legal here which is about Council Tax liability and about whether a periodic tenancy is contractual or statutory.

Why does this matter? Because in the hierarchy of council tax liability, the tenant is liable for council tax so long as they are in occupation, or if they have a ‘material interest’ of 6 months or more, for the duration of the tenancy. Otherwise, it is the landlord who is liable (section 6 Local Government Finance Act 1992).

The Broadley case says (unless and until it is changed on appeal) that the tenant is liable (so far as the Council are concerned) if a periodic tenancy is contractual but not if it is statutory.

The point raised by the delegate was a different one, though. He asked – if the tenant is in a statutory periodic tenancy and is not liable for Council Tax under the Council Tax rules – wouldn’t any tenancy agreement clause requiring the tenant to pay Council tax be unfair?

Under the Unfair Terms rules (now part of the Consumer Rights Act 2015) any clause which materially changes the rights of a tenant for the worse is vulnerable to being found unfair and unenforceable.

This point is particularly significant for tenancy deposit adjudicators (the delegate was a tenancy deposit adjudicator!) as it will affect whether or not they allow deductions from the deposit for claims where landlords have had to pay Council Tax when the tenancy agreement clause provides for it to be paid by tenants.

The other problem is that Council Tax is generally lumped in with all the other utilities so if the clause is found invalid, this may affect the landlord’s right to claim for these also. So I am considering putting Council Tax liability in a completely separate clause.

I would be interested to hear what your views are on all this.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Tales from my work Tagged With: tenancy agreements

Scroll down for the comments

Landlord Law for Landlords

Are you a landlord, unsure how to manage your properties in these uncertain times?  My Landlord Law service can help you in this crisis by providing online help and guidance and giving you one to one advice in the members' forum area.

>> Find out more about Landlord Law.


IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« Tenancy Agreements 33 days of tips – Day 4 – tenancy types
Tessa Shepperson’s Friday Newsround #6 »

Comments

  1. Lewis says

    February 2, 2017 at 8:41 PM

    I had a tenner who hadn’t paid council tax. The council attempted to bill me. I simply stated there was a Tennant the asked for a forwarding address and some documents and I never heard back from them. I assume they chased the Tennant. So what’s the point putting a potentially unfair clause in your agreement when worst that can happen is some time copying some documents?

    I should also add this was in the days before deposit protection. So have to ask if a deposit was paid to landlord for council tax. Could the scheme ensure the council tax was paid with the money? Other wise the Tennant could be on the hook twice which couldn’t be right?

    • Jack says

      February 4, 2017 at 10:21 AM

      I don’t think that’s the usual experience Lewis. As the Broadley case makes clear, a statutory periodic tenant who is no longer in occupation isn’t liable for council tax so the council can’t chase them for it.

  2. Jack says

    February 4, 2017 at 10:31 AM

    I think a clause like this is always at risk of being considered unfair. It’s an entirely one sided clause which improves the landlord’s position and provides nothing for the tenant. Certainly, I think its wise to separate it out from the utilities clauses as you don’t want to undermine those as well.

    But all this begs the question, why is the clause even necessary if you can avoid the whole issue by granting tenancies which include contractual periodic elements?

  3. Roy Badami says

    February 4, 2017 at 9:19 PM

    “The Broadley case says (unless and until it is changed on appeal) that the tenant is liable (so far as the Council are concerned) if a periodic tenancy is contractual but not if it is statutory.”

    From my reading that’s not _quite_ what it says. What it says is that if you have a tenancy agreement which contemplates a fixed term of six months or more followed by a monthly periodic tenancy, then this constitutes a single continuous tenancy with a duration of at least 6 months, and hence the tenant is liable for council tax.

    It’s not the fact that the tenancy is contractual that is important, per se. It’s the fact that this particular construction results in the continuation of the original tenancy beyond the initial term, rather than the creation of a new tenancy.

    Splitting hairs? Perhaps. But looking at it this way makes the decision much easier to understand.

    • Nassar says

      February 6, 2017 at 6:53 PM

      Even if your contract runs into periodic the original will state the same terms apply after the fixed period if the tenant continues to live there. Then if you give a renewal making refernce to the original contract signed by the same tenant for a new fixed period, that contract will also state that after the period is up the terms will continue to apply month-to-month. After that if notice is given by either party (1 month notice by tenant, 2 months by landlord) and the tenant stays until the last day of that notice then I fail to see how this should be a Landlord’s problem. They will already be paying CT elsewhere as proof they don’t live there.

  4. David says

    February 7, 2017 at 7:35 PM

    The tenant signed the contract so should be liable for the council tax. Also the tenant should be liable for Gas, Electricity and water charges unless the landlord uses those services. And the tenant is liable for 5 months rent if they moved out at the end of the first month !

    Why should landlords foot all the costs when tenants just take advantage of good landlords …

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Choose whether you want to get >> all posts or just the >> weekly roundups

You will also get a FREE Ebook!

Featured Tenancy Agreement Post

bespoke tenancy agreement

Our Top Twelve Posts on Tenancy Agreements

More Posts from this Category

Some of our Other Services:

Get Your FREE Ebook

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2020 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2021 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept