• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Are Property Redress Schemes Useless?

March 9, 2017 by Tessa Shepperson

Useless Redress SchemesAnswer – No!  And here’s why:

Some of you may have seen reports on the BBC website and on Property Industry Eye about problems with rogue letting agent Carter Stones.

The reports talk about various customers who have lost money to Carter Stones and who obtained awards via the Property Redress Scheme. However Carter Stones have failed to pay up and the complainants are still out of pocket.

They are not pleased.

The Property Redress Schemes

There are three authorised property redress schemes, The Property Ombudsman, The Property Ombudsman Services and The Property Redress Scheme (the scheme referred to in the article).

I should start by saying that I am a member of the Property Redress Scheme Council as an independent member (ie I am not an employee) and have been for some time.  This article is an attempt to explain where they stand and their place in the scheme of things.

I should also say that the question of enforcement has always bothered us on the Council and we have discussed it many times.

The BBC Article

Here is part of the BBC article quoting some of the people interviewed in their report:

“The PRS is pretty much useless,” Mr Soeyono told me.

Teresa said: “The PRS is not effective at all, absolutely not in the case of a rogue agent. They’re just using the scheme for their benefit.”

The PRS does not require letting agents to sign up to a code of conduct, and does not publish a list of companies that have been expelled on its website.

Let’s first clear up the last two points.

  • The Property Redress Scheme does publish a list of expelled agents. You will find it here at the top.
  • Although there is no specific code of conduct which members sign up to, when the Ombudsman is considering a case, it will be judged against the Private Rented Sector Code published on the RICS site here or if the agent is signed up to a more onerous code, to that code.

A misunderstanding

I think one of the problems shown up by this issue is that people misunderstand the role of the Property Redress Schemes.

This is essentially to provide a free route for landlords and tenants who are unhappy with their agents’ service (or the service provided by any of the other PRS members) which they can use to make a complaint, as an alternative to going to court.

This is beneficial as court proceedings are expensive, time-consuming and very stressful.  A complaint to the agents’ Property Redress Scheme is free and considerably less stressful for people who are often already stressed out, or out of pocket, by the issue they are complaining about.

So the schemes all have procedures for members customers to use when making a complaint and qualified adjudicators to consider their case and make decisions and (where appropriate) awards. For example, they have the power to award up to £25,000 – although lower awards are more usual.

Many cases are resolved at an early stage. If the initial mediation does not succeed, the Ombudsman will make his (or her) award and the Scheme member notified. They are then given a period of time to comply.

If the member fails to comply

In the vast majority of cases, the scheme member will pay up, or apologise or do whatever he has been ordered to do. If they don’t do this, the penalty is expulsion from the scheme.

This may sound like a bit of a rubbish penalty but actually its not. Under law, all letting agents and property managers must be a member of an authorised redress scheme as a condition of being in business.

So if they are expelled from their scheme, they are no longer compliant with the law. None of the other schemes are going to accept them as a member (unless and until they comply with the award made) as they all exchange information about which firms have been expelled and have an agreement to this effect.

The rogue agent will then be vulnerable to being fined £5,000 and ultimately being closed down by the Local Authority.

The problem with enforcement

The problem is, as the people interviewed in the BBC article found, this does not really help the victims of the rogue agent.

However, there is nothing the Redress Scheme (any of the Redress Schemes) can do about it. They don’t have any powers to enforce the award – that is not what they were set up to do.

And anyway – what could they do? How do you enforce a financial award against a criminal who has either spent all the money or hidden it where it can’t be found?

It’s the same in other areas. For example, many, probably as many as 30% of all County Court Judgements go unpaid. But we don’t say that Judges are useless and that there is no point in having a County Court system.

Then what about injunctions – court orders ordering people not to do something. They will work against most law abiding people – but what about unhinged fanatical bitter ex-partners determined to attack and maybe kill their former spouse no matter what?  They won’t take any notice of a piece of paper.  Only the sort of security used for Presidents and Royalty will stop unhinged fanatics (and not always then).

It only works with the law abiding

And that’s the thing. Our system works by and large, because most people, people who are not unhinged, people who want to live in the ‘real world’, run a respectable business and get credit if necessary, will abide by judgements and awards made against them.

YOU probably would, wouldn’t you? If you knew that failing to pay up would make your business illegal?

But not if you are a rogue agent. If you are outside societies norms, you won’t care. Which means that society has no hold on you.

Only a small proportion of people are rogues and criminals, though.  In most cases, the awards and court orders work – because most people respect the law.

Local Authority Funding issues

The other problem with the Redress Schemes and failure to comply with their awards, is that enforcement action needs to be taken by Local Authority Trading Standards Offices (NOT the property redress schemes). However, we all know the problems they have at the moment with funding.

Most Local Authorities (with a few honourable exceptions) don’t have the staff or the expertise to deal with this sort of thing.

Maybe when the Housing & Planning Act 2016 comes into force and they are able to keep some of the penalty fines they issue things may change. But it will take a while.

The real answer

The real answer is to prevent the crooks and the criminals from setting up as letting agents in the first place.

We need proper regulation of the industry – which means proper training and qualification requirements, licensing of agents and mandatory client money protection. Letting agents should be regulated in the same way as solicitors – after all they too hold huge amounts of other people’s money

It is only then, that we will have a chance of eradicating the sort of situation reported by the BBC in their article.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Analysis

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« Tenancy Agreements 33 days of tips – Day 9 – Guarantees
Tessa Shepperson Friday Newsround #9 »

Comments

  1. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    March 9, 2017 at 5:48 PM

    I deal with issues like this all the time and there needs to be a connection between the redress schemes and the people charged with enforcing non compliance AKA the trading standards teams of the local authority.

    Most London boroughs have somewhere on average of 200 letting agents, ranging from the decent to the criminal, taking in the downright dodgy on the way.

    I downloaded the PRS scheme list of excluded agents and I immediately recognised three of them from personal experience. (interesting that a large proportion are based in Ilford)

    Newham is the only London borough with a designated team dealing solely with dodgy agents. To get info on those expelled would require generic teams to pro-actively search out excluded agents but imposed cuts by the DCLG mean the people who would do this work dont exist anymore in most authorities.

    This year will see the creation of banning orders and a rogue landlord database. It would really help data research if the redress schemes notified local authorities when an agent had been expelled. Enforcement might stand a better chance of success, bearing in mind that trading standards deals with a wealth of problems from doorstep crime (the biggest complaint – dodgy tarmackers selling rubbish building work to your granny) and removing illegal billboards (the majority you see are illegal but the council are charged with taking them down whilst simultaneously not being allowed to destroy them by law, so in the absence of having anywhere to store the bloody things at council tax payer’s expense are forced to leave them up)

    Redress schemes dont have the teeth. The teeth are left to the council but cuts in budgets means they have nobody to do the work. Working on a case by case basis they might be able to do something

    • Fair Man says

      March 10, 2017 at 8:15 AM

      Why can’t we have a “rogue tenant” database as their are far more rogue tenants than landlords. So called bad tenants cost landlords thousands in lost rent !!!!! And their is absolutely no law to stop them!! Their must be about 1pct bad landlords and they have countless laws to abide by, bad tenants can simply get away with it leaving criminal damage and debts. I rest my case

  2. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    March 10, 2017 at 8:24 AM

    Sorry to double post Tessa but I am doing more digging into tracking down expelled agents.

    I went on the the Property Ombudsman website to look at their list of expelled agents (Yes I know some on there as well) but confusingly read contradictory information.

    an article on the latest expellees (if thats a word) says this “Without registration these companies cannot legally trade as letting agents, and other redress schemes will not allow previously expelled agents to join.”

    but in the webpage with the list of expelled agents it contradicts itself by saying “They may still be registered with us for lettings or sales redress, or be registered with another redress scheme. If they are not on that list we recommend you check with the alternative redress schemes, who may be able to take up a complaint.”

    So which is it? either an expelled agent cant be taken on by another scheme or they can, in which case it seems to me that if it is the latter then an expelled agent can simply move around the system re-registering every time they get expelled.

    If it the former then it makes prosecution for trading as an expelled agent a lot easier.

  3. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    March 10, 2017 at 4:35 PM

    @ Fair Man
    Marvellous……..and your comment on the article is????

  4. Rent Rebel says

    April 4, 2017 at 2:59 PM

    Ben, just looking at the PRS website to find the text you’re alluding to. To your knowledge have they since amended? Only, I can’t find that text. Thanks.

    • Rent Rebel says

      April 6, 2017 at 2:00 PM

      Oops, I see you were alluding to TPO’s website there Ben (and not The PRS one!). That text is still there, and it is confusing I agree. I’m going to contact them to try and get some clarity.

  5. Rent Rebel says

    April 7, 2017 at 7:06 PM

    So, TPOS and the PRS have an expelled members list but Ombudsman Services don’t.

    In response to my enquiry, they said :

    Thank you for your enquiry.

    We do not list our expelled members if your wish to see if a company is a member you can visit
    our website or call us on 033 044 01634 we are open 9-5 Monday – Friday.
    For more information about Ombudsman Services visit our website
    http://www.ombudsman-services.org

    So that’s really unhelpful isn’t it. If they’re not keeping any list then how are they telling TPOS and the PRS who they’ve expelled? And if they are keeping a list then why not make it public?

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Sign up to our
>> daily updates

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Tessa Shepperson

Why you need and how to get proper legal advice on landlord and tenant issues

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept