• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Service of documents on a tenant abroad and section 196 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

April 11, 2017 by Tessa Shepperson

Registered postThis is a question to the blog clinic ‘fast track’ service from Christian who is a tenant.

I have a couple of questions regarding the Law of property act 1925.

Regarding 196 section 3 if the landlord has agreed to use an overseas address for correspondence. I have this in an email with confirmation from the landlord. They then serve notice to the U.K. Is this acceptable or is there any legal precedent.

Regarding section 4 is registered mail a requirement or an option? If not sent via registered mail what are the consequences regarding payment of long term agreement?

Answer

Section 196 of the Law of Property Act 1925 sets out circumstances where a notice served on a landlord or a tenant will be deemed served without having to actually prove it was received.

Here is the wording of sub-sections 3 and 4, which are the sections referred to:

(3) Any notice required or authorised by this Act to be served shall be sufficiently served if it is left at the last-known place of abode or business in the United Kingdom of the lessee, lessor, mortgagee, mortgagor, or other person to be served, or, in case of a notice required or authorised to be served on a lessee or mortgagor, is affixed or left for him on the land or any house or building comprised in the lease or mortgage, or, in case of a mining lease, is left for the lessee at the office or counting-house of the mine.

(4) Any notice required or authorised by this Act to be served shall also be sufficiently served, if it is sent by post in a registered letter addressed to the lessee, lessor, mortgagee, mortgagor, or other person to be served, by name, at the aforesaid place of abode or business, office, or counting-house, and if that letter is not returned by the postal operator (within the meaning of Part 3 of the Postal Services Act 2011) concerned undelivered; and that service shall be deemed to be made at the time at which the registered letter would in the ordinary course be delivered.

A few words first about service of documents.

When the problem arises

The problem only arises if someone claims that they have not received something – document, a notice, a letter or whatever. So if it has been received and accepted and there is no dispute, that’s fine.

Section 196 is a way of ensuring that service of notices is effective. If it is used properly then documents served in accordance with it will be deemed served even if the other party never actually received them.

For example in Van Haarlam v.Kasner in 1992 a notice was held to be properly served even though the landlord knew the tenant was in prison.

Note by the way that s196 refers just to notices. It’s not referring to general correspondence, although a letter can sometimes constitute a notice.

Only in the United Kingdom

The section specifically refers to an address ‘in the United Kingdom’. I don’t think therefore that section 196 will or can apply if the notice is served on a party elsewhere.

That is not to say that documents relating to UK property can’t be served outside of the UK – just that if the other party denies receipt, proof of service cannot be deemed under s 196.

The person who served the document will have to prove service by some other way. This could include:

  • Proof of delivery of a recorded or registered postal item
  • Evidence of a process server (one prepared to go abroad!)
  • Evidence from someone who witnessed service or maybe
  • Some sort of admission from the party, for example, a letter where they refer to having received the document

Generally, though, it is expected that notices relating to a UK property will be served in the same country (for example in England & Wales).  Bearing in mind that the UK courts don’t have a lot of control over what happens abroad.

And anyway if the property is a two bedroomed flat in, say, the Tottenham Court Road in London, why are notices regarding it being served in Geneva or Hong Kong (to pick two places at random)?

S196 does not always apply

Another point to note is that s196 does not always apply. The wording refers to “Any notice required or authorised by this Act”. However, it is fairly common for agreements to incorporate section 196 so it can be used to ensure that notices are deemed served – even if the notice or document is not one which is specifically served under the Law of Property Act 196.

I assume that your agreement refers to s196 and incorporates it into the agreement you are concerned with.

Can service be tied to service at a particular address?

It rather looks from your question though as if you are asking a slightly different question – asking whether a notice CAN be served in the UK (eg pursuant to s196) if it has been agreed that the notice will be served elsewhere – somewhere abroad according to your question.

Or can be agreed that a document or notice will ONLY be served in a specific manner or at a certain address? Can you say “although I have received this letter it cannot be deemed to be served on me as we agreed that I would only be served documents at XYZ address”?

Technically parties to an agreement can agree whatever they want. However if, for example, it was agreed between the parties to an agreement that a document would only be served on the tenant at Address X but the document was in fact served at Address Y – if it is proved that the tenant actually received it, I would be very surprised indeed if the Judge disallowed service of the document just because it was served at a different address.

Or can it be deemed served under s196 if you asked for it to be served elsewhere?

Alternatively, are you asking if the landlord can be deemed to have served a notice on you, if it was served on you in England but you never got it because you are currently abroad AND you told the landlord this and asked that any paperwork be sent to you there.

My feeling here is that if s196 is incorporated into your tenancy and the service complied with it – the notice will be deemed served – as it was in the case above where the tenant was actually in prison.

The way to avoid this happening is to arrange for your post to be re-directed to you while you are abroad by a postal re-direct.  Or arrange for a friend to come in and do this for you while you are away.

Have you GOT to use section 196?

So far as your second question is concerned, section 196 (assuming it applies to an agreement) is permissive only. You don’t HAVE to use the methods of service it describes.

So long as you are able to prove service it won’t matter if it was served in some other way.

In conclusion

If a notice is served, the party who served it has the job of proving that it was served, if the person who is supposed to have received it denies this.

Section 196 is there to help in hard cases.  However, it does not always apply and documents do not have to be served in the manner set out in the section.

So long as you can prove that the notice (or whatever) was actually received – that is enough.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Readers problems

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« David Smith gives advice to landlords on how NOT to do Rent to Rent
Tenancy Agreements 33 days of tips – Day 14 – The Deposit »

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Sign up to our
>> daily updates

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Tessa Shepperson

Why you need and how to get proper legal advice on landlord and tenant issues

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept