• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

Do tenants have any redress for deceptive and misleading break clauses?

May 23, 2017 by Tessa Shepperson

Thats not what I agreed to!I have advised two tenants in the past two weeks both of whom have essentially the same problem. The break clause in their tenancy agreement did not work in the way that they assumed it would.

In neither case was the precise workings of the clause explained to the tenants.

Let’s take a look at them.

Break clause number 1

Here the tenant had a 12-month tenancy. The break clause read as follows:

If the tenant wishes to end the tenancy prior to or upon the expiry of its fixed term, then the tenant may give the Landlord no less than one calendar month’s notice in writing to be served in person or sent by 1st class mail stating that he/she wishes to leave the property, provided always that such notice can only expire at the end of the seventh month of this tenancy or at the end of the fixed term of this
tenancy.

The tenant assumed that he could break the tenancy at any time during the second half of the tenancy.  So he was shocked to be told after he had given his notice, that this could only be done at one point in the tenancy – at the end of month six to expire at the end of month seven.

As it was now after the sixth month, the agents informed him that he had lost his opportunity to end the tenancy early and would have to stay there until the end of the fixed term.

Break clause number 2

Here the tenant negotiated what he thought was a 12-month break clause in a 3 year fixed term. He told the agents that he wanted to be able to do this as there was a rent increase after the end of the first year and he wanted to be able to end the tenancy then in case he was unable at that time to afford the new rent.

However the break clause in the tenancy agreement he actually signed read as follows:

Any time after twelve months of the initial fixed term of this tenancy either party may exercise two months written notice, at the end of the first twelve months or thereafter, to the other. At the end of such notice the tenancy shall end and all obligations and responsibilities shall cease; subject nevertheless to any claim by either party against the other in respect of any breach of any of the terms and conditions of the agreement.

Which is in effect a 14-month break clause rather than a 12 month one. This has put the tenant into all sorts of difficulties as he needs to move now for his work but cannot afford to pay two rents.

Tenant remedies for unfairness

It is arguable that in both of these cases the tenant is at fault as they should have read the tenancy agreement properly. However, most non-lawyers find contact terms difficult and in both these cases, the tenants trusted the agents to add a clause as agreed.

Indeed it is because tenants (who are treated as consumers) don’t normally read contractual documents that we have the unfair terms regulations (now part of the Consumer Rights Act 2015).

So do these tenants have any redress under the consumer legislation?

The Unfair Terms rules

These are there to protect consumers from clauses which are unfair or unfairly take away tenants rights.  The available remedies though do not help either of my two tenants.

The remedy for an unfair term under the unfair terms rules is to make the term unenforceable.  Which is good if the term is, say, imposing a harsh penalty clause or unreasonable conditions on the use of the property.

However, in the case of an unfair break clause, this is not what the tenants want. Making the clause unenforceable would just make things worse.  What they want is a break clause worded as they had agreed with the agents.

Sadly though, the unfair terms rules do not provide for an offending clause to be amended in this way. Although this is in essence what both my tenants hoped they would be entitled to

If it had been a case of ambiguity, there is clause 60(1) which says

If a term in a consumer contract, or a consumer notice, could have different meanings, the meaning that is most favourable to the consumer is to prevail.

However, I think both the clauses (when you look at them properly) are fairly clear so this won’t help them either.

Unwinding tenancies

The other right tenants have under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 is to ‘unwind’ (or end) the tenancy during the first three months if the landlord or agent have acted unfairly.  If this is done during the first month, the tenant can also recover all payments made.

I think both agents have acted unfairly. Both of the clauses which actually appeared in the tenancy were significantly different from the clauses the tenants expected. However, in both cases, (and understandably) the tenants did not find out about the problem until after the three month period for unwinding the tenancy was over.

So that rule, again, does not help them.

Claiming Redress

The only course of action that I can see is available to them is to put in a complaint to the agents Property Redress Scheme. In both cases, the agent had used a clause which was different from that discussed and agreed with the tenant. So it is arguable that this is unfair conduct.

For example, even if the agents were unable to use a clause worded as requested by the tenant because of the terms of their agent’s agreement with their landlord (and remember it is the landlord who is the agent’s client, NOT the tenants) – they should have explained this to the tenants.

Not allow them to continue under a misapprehension.

Have any other tenants experienced similar problems and if so were they able to resolve them?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Tales from my work

Scroll down for the comments

Landlord Law for Landlords

Are you a landlord, unsure how to manage your properties in these uncertain times?  My Landlord Law service can help you in this crisis by providing online help and guidance and giving you one to one advice in the members' forum area.

>> Find out more about Landlord Law.


IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« Can agents claim commission for another year when the landlord wants the tenants to leave?
Tenancy Agreements 33 days of tips – Day 20 – Business Use »

Comments

  1. Lawcruncher says

    May 23, 2017 at 11:09 AM

    Rather than argue that the clauses are unfair, should the tenants not be arguing that they are entitled to rectification on the grounds that the clauses do not reflect what was agreed?

  2. Tim says

    May 25, 2017 at 3:14 PM

    Presumably the tenant was charged a fee by the letting agent for the tenancy agreement. If so, the tenant has redress against the letting agent.

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Landlord Law Virtual Conference 2021

Make sure you and your staff are fully up to date with the law – remember the only 100% protection against penalties and fines is 100% compliance!

Our virtual Conference has expert legal speakers and the recordings will be available for 3 months after the event.

Click here to find out more

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Choose whether you want to get
>> daily updates or just the
>> weekly roundups

You will also get a FREE Ebook!

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Coronavirus

Landlords and the Coronavirus Emergency – keeping records

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2020 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2021 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept