• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Should law and justice be free? Part 7: Summing up

October 11, 2017 by Tessa Shepperson

Should Law and Justice be Free?So what have we learned over the past six weeks?

Court fees

We have learned that if court fees are too high this reduces access to the courts.

But the courts are a branch of the State rather than a ‘consumer service’. Effectively denying large sectors of the population access to justice is dangerous as it could lead to people taking the law into their own hands.

Not a good thing for society.

The complex system

Although they are in many ways inevitable, over complex laws can also unnecessarily increase costs which in turn may lead to a denial of justice.

Lawyers costs

These are high, partly because training lawyers and running law firms is expensive and partly because (at the moment) many are prepared to pay. But this will change if a cheaper alternative becomes available.

The advances in technology we are starting to see will inevitably, long term, have a downwards effect on fees.

Legal Aid

This was at one time a viable alternative for many people but it had big problems. Government cuts (for civil legal aid) have now taken it away from all but the poorest in society, and only then where there is a viable case.

For most people, legal aid is not an option. So they are left with:

Online / technology solutions

The internet and technology has made much legal information freely available and there are now many online, and cheaper, services for the production of documents, and in some cases, legal procedures.

This will increase as time goes by, and long-term will undoubtedly result in a dramatic reduction in costs and greater access to justice.

There are indications that the development of Artificial Intelligence will in time take over much of traditional lawyer’s work and therefore the charges made – but this has not happened yet.

A way forward?

When I originally thought about this series, I wondered whether things would work out like this:

  • The traditional service being there for people and companies who have the wherewithal to pay the hefty fees for 1:1 legal advice
  • Legal Aid being there for the very poorest and also those who are unable for some reason to use the cheaper online services. Perhaps due to mental or other problems
  • The new online and automation services being available for everyone else.

The main problem with this vision is the reluctance of most law firms to implement the cheaper online and automation solutions.

Calling time on time

Most lawyers are still wedded to traditional charging procedures in particular charging for their time at an hourly rate. Even alternative methods of charging – such as fixed fees – tend to be based on an hourly rate.

However, charging by the hour is deeply unpopular with clients, because it rewards inefficiency and penalises quick workers. And it is also unnecessary. We now have better ways of doing things than putting on a suit and going to see a bloke in an office.

The march of the legal machines

This is a quote from UK Human Rights Blog reporting on a podcast  made by Richard Susskind, IT advisor to the Lord Justice

Lawyers have to get their heads around the fact that they must innovate and invent if they want to be market leaders. Being great people delivering a great service via a fine brand is no longer enough; the whole thing is breaking down where these services are being delivered by different entities, and some of those entities are algorithms or software packages.

Inevitably these new entities are going to drive down costs. Law and legal advice, are going to be a lot cheaper in about 20 years, than now.

So – should law and justice be free?

I think there is a strong argument for court fees to be, if not free, at least affordable. As we saw in part 2, it should be every citizen’s right to go to law. Very high court fees effectively remove this right.

So far as making the law available to all – this has already been done – statues, case law and the Civil Procedure rules can now all be found online. See the links on this page below the index.  The trouble is that few people can understand them due to their complexity.

I think that there is a strong argument for ensuring that our laws, at the very least, those which are intended for consumers, are couched in a less difficult and more understandable style. Whether this will ever happen though is debatable.

Assuming that our legal system remains complex, most people will need a lawyer or at least some sort of legal guidance, to help them.  Lawyers are businesses and cannot be forced to provide free or low-cost services. So their services will only be free if they decide to offer them for free – for example via ‘pro bono’ (posh legal word for free) initiatives.

But law firms are subject to market forces. So long as people are willing to pay their high fees, they will continue to charge them.

However, with the massive upheaval that is taking place and will continue to take place in all our lives due to changes in technology, this will change. New services are being developed which will undercut traditional lawyers fees and force them to charge less or work in a different way.  Or develop different, cheaper services.

And finally

I have a warning for traditional law firms. You ignore the new technology at your peril. Its progress cannot be stopped any more than King Canute could stop the tide coming in by holding up his hand.

If lawyers do not reduce their costs by implementing modern ways of delivery of legal services, then non-lawyers will step in and do it instead. Which could mean the profession being left behind and marginalised.

And many things that lawyers now charge for may indeed end up being low cost or even free.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: should law and justice be free

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« Suggestions for a tenant who has received an eviction notice
Protecting tenants whose Landlords face mortgage repossession proceedings »

Index of Posts:

Links will be added once the posts go live

  • Part 1 - Introduction
  • Part 2 - Court Fees
  • Part 3 - Our Complex System
  • Part 4 - Lawyers Fees
  • Part 5 - Legal Aid
  • Part 6 - Online / technology Solutions
  • Part 7 - Conclusion

Sources of Law

  • Statute
  • Case Law
  • Civil Procedure Rules

Other relevant posts:

  • Why does housing law have to be so complicated?
  • How much does it cost to evict a tenant?

Get you FREE Ebook

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept