• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

The state of our County Courts

October 31, 2017 by Ben Reeve-Lewis

County Court Closures - Lambeth County CourtThe County Court System

People who only trouble the county courts now and again might not be aware that the county court system has gotten itself into a parlous state in the last few years.

A government obsessed with cuts in public services has not only hit councils, police and the NHS but also the court service itself with 86 Magistrates and county courts either closed or about to be. The list is here

The Ministry of Justice is of course quite clear that this will create problems for all litigants, not just those in housing and so they are tinkering around the edges with some other ideas to deal with the closures and meet budget restrictions.

Trouble is, they are closing the courts without actually having firm alternatives in place first.

This has been coming for some time.

In better times

Back in the good old days, each county court had a listings office, open to the public from 10am to 4pm, where anyone could rock up with their paperwork and hand it in, pay money over the counter and register claims. Then the hours went down to 10am to 2pm and not long after that, in some courts 10am to 12pm.

Then the cutbacks

They then came up with the drop-box idea, which was meant putting your application through a letterbox and keeping your fingers crossed that someone would actually do something with it, receiving no confirmation that it had been received or actioned.

Fine for routine cases but not so fine when an application has been put in to avert an eviction the following morning when you really need to talk to a human being to set people’s minds at rest and alert the homelessness unit of a possible impending case.

And its got a lot worse

The latest piece of nonsense is litigants having to call a designated number simply to make an appointment to stand in a queue the next day and hand their form in and yes, you guessed it, try getting through on that number!?!?!

I was hanging on for the best part of 50 minutes a couple of days ago dealing with an emergency while my mobile battery was dying by the second.

It’s not just me!

I was complaining about this to a leading housing lawyer of my acquaintance (not Tessa) who told me that she had recently drafted some paperwork for her client and instructed her to call the court to make the appointment to hand it in and when the client couldn’t make contact she tried it herself and called repeatedly before she even got through only to be redirected to an entirely different court.

I only know housing matters, God only knows how the closure of courts and this new pre-calling system is impacting on family law and child custody cases, or any of the other important issues that go through a county court.

Getting to the listing offices is actually just the start of it

That aside, once access to the listings offices is actually achieved things don’t exactly run smoothly.

On the walls of the waiting area, there is always a sign saying

“Listings staff cannot give legal advice”.

Whilst I can understand that listings staff aren’t legally trained, I know from hearing people talking in the queue, that often all they want is advice on the court procedures or which form to use, not legal advice, such procedural information being what you would think the listings office staff would, in reality, be employed and trained to give.

Here is just one example

Take the most common and standard court form, the N244, a simple enough document that is used for countless applications for a variety of reasons but it contains questions that people understandably would like to have clarification on:-

  • Have you attached a draft of the order you are applying for?
  • How do you want this application dealt with?
  • What level of Judge does your hearing need?

No problems if you fill these in all the time but for many court users a bit of a puzzle, perhaps making the one and only application they will ever make in their life that they might like some guidance on. Explanatory notes often being just as perplexing to a lay person.

Briggs Report

Last year’s Briggs report on creating online courts from 2020 onwards was clear that housing repossession cases would not be included, so presumably, the current system is the one we will be using for years to come.  But my experience and that of others who do my kind of work is that there are massive holes in the process that need plugging urgently.

The accelerated application form N5B only requires the landlord to state whether or not the property needs a licence and whether the deposit has been protected and over 2 years in, none of the additional requirement of the Deregulation Act, such as proof that a gas safe certificate has been issued has been added to the form.

The accelerated system

This is designed for normal, law-abiding people to file claims, having satisfied the legal requirements for doing so but as regular readers know, I work in the area where crooks bend and distort those systems for their own ends and unless the courts address this element then the online system will be a disaster for thousands of people, as it is right now.

The crooks usually fill in the form saying the property doesn’t need a licence and if they do acknowledge receipt of a deposit (which is rare) they simply make up a registration number to fit the box.

The courts are not required to investigate whether or not the information provided is true, relying instead on the rather quaint notion that everybody tells the truth.

If the boxes are filled in, to the judge’s satisfaction the possession order is merely rubber stamped. When we get into court to have the possession order set aside for these reasons, which is several times a month, the Judges have no problem doing so but don’t even comment on the abuse of process that resulted in the order being granted in the first place.

Nary a wrist is even slapped.

On the bright side

In the past couple of weeks, I have been made aware of 2 initiatives where judges are looking at creating a new form that reduces the chances of possession orders being granted where the landlord hasn’t fulfilled specific requirements and another panel meeting to examine the fallout that occurs when possession orders are granted in error.

I can only hope that a suitably robust form will be created as a result, because currently, whilst the courts are looking to reduce court cases and therefore delays for users, in actual fact more court time is being wasted with further applications in defence and seeking to set possession orders aside.

The result of all this?

Homelessness units are having to rehouse people who shouldn’t have been evicted in the first place and the stress upon the families themselves is enormous.

And finally

If you want to read the sorry story of the problems associated with the closure of just one court – Lambeth – see this post from Nearly Legal.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: News and comment

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Ben Reeve-Lewis

Ben is a founder Member of Safer Renting, an independent tenants rights advice and advocacy service working in partnership with the property licensing and enforcement teams from a number of London boroughs.

« Energy Efficiency Minimum Standards – the new rules
The Housing Crisis: Moving jobs to where the homes are »

The Enforcement Officer's story

Ben Reeve Lewis

Ben Reeve LewisBen Reeve Lewis has worked for Local Authorities for over 20 years.

First as a Tenancy Relations Officer and now as a freelance Enforcement Officer.

He is a regular writer for the Landlord Law Blog and has also appeared on TV - for example in the first series of Channel Five's Nightmare Tenants, Slum Landlords.

In these posts, he talks about his work trying to help poor tenants in London and track down the criminal landlords who exploit them.

As well as giving his views - based on his experience as a practising enforcement officer - of government policy and practice.

The business models of criminal landlords explained

This is a short series explaining how criminal landlords operate.

  • How tenants are a crop for criminal landlords to harvest
  • Why the real rogue landlords are all about the money
  • Aliases and fake companies in the rogue landlord world
  • How Criminal landlords use dodgy contracts and misdirection
  • The Criminal business model of ‘Rent to Rent’
  • Accommodation models for Criminal Landlords
  • Tackling the problem

An interview with Ben Reeve Lewis (on 18/5/18)

Some recent Posts

(The most recent posts are at the top)
  • Court closures scandal
  • The Shocking truth about criminal letting agents today
  • Property Guardians Revisited
  • Common sense, law and the reality of renting
  • How Rent Repayment Orders work
  • Considering Housing MOTs
  • The New Rugg Report
  • Guardian lettings - is the end in sight>
  • Lessons to be learned from Nottingham Letting Agent Prosecution
  • Signatures and the Companies Act
  • Considering the New HMO Regulations
  • Select Committee Report
  • Tenant or renter
  • Police colluding with landlors in illegal evictions
  • European Renting
  • Fitness for Habitation bill
  • Tenants bins
  • Interim and Final Management Orders
  • Implied Surrender
  • Intentional Homelessness
  • The state of our County Courts
  • What homelessness units say to tenants and why
  • The emerging trend of Meter Tampering
  • Fire Safety in Micro Units
  • The Club Member Scam
  • How do we find slum properties?
  • The startling story of tenants who dare not ask for rent receipts
  • Does licensing landlords really do any good?
  • What do you really know about Rogue Landlords?
  • The Growing Problem of Cannabis Farms in Rented Properties
  • Protecting tenants whose Landlords face mortgage repossession proceedings
  • A warning to new landlords taking over existing tenancies


>> Click here for more posts by Ben.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept