• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

Ben Reeve Lewis Tales from the trenches – Grappling with the frontline of housing law enforcement

August 14, 2018 by Tessa Shepperson

Ben Reeve LewisI wrote recently of Nottingham council’s successful prosecution of an agent by combining consumer trading regulations with housing enforcement.

Another case from Nottingham

Hot off the back of that I saw they quickly did another one,  using the same tactic, where the landlord Shafaqat Ali Sadiq was fined for aggressive practices in assaulting his tenant, failing to protect a deposit and running an unlicensed HMO.

The article informs us that Mr Sadiq said in his defence in court that he believed that protecting the deposit was merely a matter of choice. Haha, nice try.

The fine of £1,750 could have been better but that’s down to the judge, not the council and at least now he can be given a banning order.  Oh and lets not forget the tenant can also claim back 12 month’s rent under a Rent Repayment Order, not to mention a civil claim for damages.

“It ain’t over till its over”, as Lenny Kravitz once sang.

Speaking of Lenny, Camden council have also been getting similarly funky of late with a very curious prosecution of a managing agent who argued that they weren’t.

Before I explain the gory details I should explain something.

The practice of confusion

In the past couple of years, people in my line of work have been seeing a massive increase in practices whereby dubious letting agents will create smoke and mirrors to throw housing enforcement off of their scent.
Put simply, if you want to take legal action against a person or company then you have to be sure who you are entitled to go after.

The confusion is achieved through simply having different companies and individuals involved performing different roles, who when approached all point the finger at each other saying “Not me guvnor”
This is the hot topic of conversation among everyone I know in the biz, simply because it is a widespread and endemic model these days.

The agents who denied

So, to the case of LB Camden v. Leycam Ltd and Citydeal Estates (London) Ltd (2018) The article on Local Government Lawyer will provide enough technical info for those of a legal bent but my aim is to summarise here.

Those old enough to remember a 1980s sitcom called “Soap”, will recall the weekly catchphrase “Confused? You will be”.

The owners were an offshore company called HPL who granted joint tenancies of three flats and the contracts stipulated that HPLs UK address was with management company Leycam Ltd.

Deposit and first month’s rent however were paid to City Estates Ltd but the rent after the first month was paid by the tenants to Citydeal, a company in the same trading group as CEL, who along with CPL formed one trading name of Citydeal estates.

You still with me?

The deposit was listed on the tenancy agreements as being held by Citydeal Estates but didn’t stipulate which bit of the trading group actually held it.

It’s not us, gov

Leycam pleaded guilty to failing to licence the HMO and nine of twelve other accommodation condition offences but CEL defended themselves using an argument that they were not the person managing the property, using as evidence the notion that in holding the tenants deposits they were only doing so as ‘Stakeholders’ for the landlord, not as agents.

CEL also argued that taking the first month’s rent only would cancel out it’s role as managing agents, rent for the subsequent ten months having been paid to Citydeal estates and therefore they should not be penalised when all they did was set the letting up.

Again the linked article gives you the nitty-gritty of Camden’s counter argument but here’s the kicker. The judge disagreed with CEL, stating that acceptance of the first month’s rent was indeed enough to qualify the agent as managing the property for the whole of the term of that tenancy.

The notion of holding deposits as a stakeholder does exist and would preclude that person from acting as an agent but in this case the acceptance of the first month’s rent persuaded the court that the arrangement was really one of managing agent.

An interesting csse

Its an interesting case for enforcement teams, agents and landlord’s alike. That the acceptance of rent when setting up a tenancy would still qualify the agent as a managing agent thereafter, has serious implications.

However, my main reason for writing this wasn’t so much to let you know about the legal arguments, which even I struggle to get my head around but to ask why, in the name of all things whacky, would a company create a system so complicated that it takes thousands of pounds and teams of lawyers just to figure out who is responsible for what?

In this case an offshore owner, a letting agent and two separate managing agents.

What possible reason could there be for creating a business model so arcane and confusing that it would make Einstein drop his pipe?

At the bottom of this are the tenants, not knowing who the hell they are dealing with and the enforcement teams trying to make properties safe, being thrown of the trail by a confusing morass of companies and aliases.

Even if there are sound business reasons for such an arrangement the way the trading company operate should be made clear under regulation 8 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

Which is yet another legal angle.

It happens all the time

This set up, utilising multiple identities is neither rare nor even unusual. In fact, it is pretty standard and in actual fact, these days I get more surprised when called in on a case where there is a clearly identified landlord, a clearly identified agent and a straightforward tenant.

I double check the paperwork to see if I’ve missed something.

I’m currently working on a case where neither owner, licence holder nor agent are stepping forward to claim responsibility or even rent. Not even to point the finger at each other. They are just completely off the radar.
In the unlikely event that they miraculously all died in the same plane crash I’m at a bit of a loss but its early days.

As I have written recently in my series on the changing profile of criminal landlords and agents, there is now so much money to be made from the private rented sector that just like the land grab of 19th Century America, it is attracting so many claim jumpers and carpet-baggers that the bottom end of the market is becoming completely skewed.

While the ordinary buy to let couple searching for an alternative to a pension simply go about their decent business all manner of snake oil salesmen and hucksters occupy the Badlands, ripping off the unwary, both tenant and owner alike.

The laws are in place, which really does help but for every law that gets created, an army of chancers will develop ever more devious methods to get around them.

People in my position try to police this bit of the sector but as someone recently said to me, of the difficulty of doing so in an austerity cuts environment, “Are we not all hat and no cattle”?

Lovin the metaphor.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: News and comment

Scroll down for the comments

Landlord Law for Landlords

Are you a landlord, unsure how to manage your properties in these uncertain times?  My Landlord Law service can help you in this crisis by providing online help and guidance and giving you one to one advice in the members' forum area.

>> Find out more about Landlord Law.


IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« Forum on Tenant Fees and Holding Deposits
Explaining the Housing Act 1988 »

Comments

  1. hbWelcome says

    August 14, 2018 at 9:19 AM

    Tenants and landlords ‘on the frontline’ of housing in Nottingham won’t be joining your fan club of the city council;

    https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/local-news/tenants-react-potential-rent-rises-1842075?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar

The Enforcement Officer's story

Ben Reeve Lewis

Ben Reeve LewisBen Reeve Lewis has worked for Local Authorities for over 20 years.

First as a Tenancy Relations Officer and now as a freelance Enforcement Officer.

He is a regular writer for the Landlord Law Blog and has also appeared on TV - for example in the first series of Channel Five's Nightmare Tenants, Slum Landlords.

In these posts, he talks about his work trying to help poor tenants in London and track down the criminal landlords who exploit them.

As well as giving his views - based on his experience as a practising enforcement officer - of government policy and practice.

The business models of criminal landlords explained

This is a short series explaining how criminal landlords operate.

  • How tenants are a crop for criminal landlords to harvest
  • Why the real rogue landlords are all about the money
  • Aliases and fake companies in the rogue landlord world
  • How Criminal landlords use dodgy contracts and misdirection
  • The Criminal business model of ‘Rent to Rent’
  • Accommodation models for Criminal Landlords
  • Tackling the problem

An interview with Ben Reeve Lewis (on 18/5/18)

Some recent Posts

(The most recent posts are at the top)
  • Court closures scandal
  • The Shocking truth about criminal letting agents today
  • Property Guardians Revisited
  • Common sense, law and the reality of renting
  • How Rent Repayment Orders work
  • Considering Housing MOTs
  • The New Rugg Report
  • Guardian lettings - is the end in sight>
  • Lessons to be learned from Nottingham Letting Agent Prosecution
  • Signatures and the Companies Act
  • Considering the New HMO Regulations
  • Select Committee Report
  • Tenant or renter
  • Police colluding with landlors in illegal evictions
  • European Renting
  • Fitness for Habitation bill
  • Tenants bins
  • Interim and Final Management Orders
  • Implied Surrender
  • Intentional Homelessness
  • The state of our County Courts
  • What homelessness units say to tenants and why
  • The emerging trend of Meter Tampering
  • Fire Safety in Micro Units
  • The Club Member Scam
  • How do we find slum properties?
  • The startling story of tenants who dare not ask for rent receipts
  • Does licensing landlords really do any good?
  • What do you really know about Rogue Landlords?
  • The Growing Problem of Cannabis Farms in Rented Properties
  • Protecting tenants whose Landlords face mortgage repossession proceedings
  • A warning to new landlords taking over existing tenancies


>> Click here for more posts by Ben.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2020 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2021 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept