• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Why you need to be very careful who you use to evict your tenants

September 4, 2018 by Tessa Shepperson

Chickens coming home to roostAfter the case of Gill v. Kassam

The Chickens are gradually coming home to roost

There are a number of practices in the (largely unregulated) private rented sector, which we lawyers have known all along were wrong, but which we have had to put up with because ‘everyone’ did them – but which are now being shown up.

The most recent being the use of unregulated eviction companies.

The eviction problem

Landlords have a problem that most other businesses don’t have.

  • If a diner refuses to pay his restaurant bill, he is barred from that restaurant
  • If a club member fails to pay his club membership he is expelled from the club
  • If you don’t pay for your airline ticket you are not let onto the plane
  • But if a tenant fails to pay his rent, landlords have to spend up to six months in the courts getting a possession order in order to evict them and are forced to house them for free until this is done

The main reason why landlords evict tenants is non-payment of rent. And it stands to reason that, not having been paid their rent but still having to pay their ‘buy to let’ mortgage and other expenses, most landlords are not in a good position to pay solicitors fees at that time.

So they look for a cheaper option.

This is what Mr and Mrs Gill did when they instructed a company called ‘Remove a Tenant’ to help them evict their tenants, Mr and Mrs Kassam, who were in serious arrears of rent.

The Gill v. Kassam case

Mr and Mrs Gill were very unfortunate. Hundreds of landlords have used unregulated firms like Remove a Tenant without any problem.

Which is surprising when you think about it.  But the issue had to come before the courts at some stage – and it happened to Mr and Mrs Gill.

At first, everything seemed normal. Proceedings were issued and a possession order was made at first instance. Then their problems started.

The tenants appealed, one of the grounds for their appeal being the fact that the firm which had acted for Mr and Mrs Gill (Remove a Tenant) were not a proper solicitors firm, and that they were, therefore, acting illegally.  Which meant (so their appeal went) the Gills’ claim should be struck out.

So what’s all that about then?

The rules about representing litigants in court proceedings

You can always represent yourself in court proceedings. All the way up to the Supreme Court, should you want to.

However, if you want to employ someone else to act for you, you come up against the Legal Services Act 2007.  This provides that certain types of legal work, known as ‘reserved activities’ – which include conveyancing, the conduct of litigation and obtaining a grant of probate – are reserved for solicitors. Or firms which have been specifically authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

There are actually very good reasons for this. For example:

  • Issuing legal proceedings is a serious business. If you get it wrong you can be ordered to pay your opponents legal costs, which (if they are represented) could come to many thousands of pounds.
  • In the context of eviction proceedings, tenants may be able to raise a defence and counterclaim which could also result in landlords having to pay substantial damages (and legal costs) to their tenants.
  • Then although it is easy to start legal proceedings it is not always easy to stop them. If you just pull out your opponent is automatically entitled to have their costs paid by the party pulling out.

Now a properly trained ligation solicitor (or paralegal under the supervision of a trained litigator) will (in most cases) check the case out thoroughly before issuing proceedings – and being properly trained, will know what to look out for.  For example, when I did eviction work I never let my clients start their court proceedings until all possible issues had been resolved.

Even if they do get it wrong (and of course they do sometimes, no-one is perfect), all solicitors are covered by extensive and comprehensive (and very expensive) professional indemnity insurance.  So their clients are protected.

Back to the Gill case

Remove a Tenant are not solicitors or a (non-solicitors) firm which is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. So although it is legal for them to advise clients, it is not legal for them to represent them in court proceedings.

It seems that what actually happened was that Mr and Mrs Gill attended at their offices where Mr Turner, the Remove a Tenant adviser acting for them, had pre-completed the PCOL (Possession Claims Online) form. Mr Gill approved it and then clicked the final button (there is a very good article which looks at what happened in more detail here).

Remove a Tenants’ address was also given as the correspondence address and they managed the proceedings generally, including payment of the court fee, instructing the solicitor advocate who attended the initial hearing and so on.

After hearing evidence, the Judge in the Gill v. Kassam case decided that all in all, this did constitute “conduct of litigation” – which is reserved for solicitors under the Legal Services Act. So, Remove a Tenant were committing a criminal act – and no doubt the SRA will be in touch with them in due course about this.

Whether assistance in court proceedings is illegal under the rules or not is quite a fine line and the Judge accepted this. There is, for example, a difference between a friend or relative helping someone out for free, and a commercial firm which does this sort of work for payment. The former is far more likely to be acceptable than the latter.

However, the Judge’s view was that in this case, they were acting illegally. So the decision then was – what should he do about it?

What the Judge did

During a hearing Judges’ form definite opinions of witnesses and the Judge, in this case, formed a favourable opinion of Mr Gill, saying

I regarded Mr Gill as an honest witness. He was obviously angry at having to go through the process of proving his case when, to his mind, his tenant owed him a lot of rent and had no good reason for not giving back possession of the property.

The Judge was less impressed with Mr Turner of Remove a Tennant, but as Remove a Tenant were not a party to the litigation, he was not able to make any order against them.

He decided in the end that it would be unfair to penalise Mr and Mrs Gill as innocent parties for something that was not their fault and so he allowed the possession order to stand.

However, unnoticed by the earlier Judge, the section 8 notice had actually been defective which meant that the Gill’s lost their mandatory ground and were just left with the discretionary grounds 10 and 11. Which could cause them problems in enforcing their order in due course.

Another reason why unregulated firms are not a good idea.

A sign of the times?

We live in an age where those with genuine expertise are regularly disrespected and many people like to think that they can do complex jobs without any proper training or experience (the prime example being Mr Trump across the pond).

You might think that it is wrong to have rules which reserves litigation to solicitors, but litigation is complex and difficult.  The rules are there to protect the public.

Eviction work may be at the ‘easy’ end of the litigation scale, but someone inexperienced can still cause a huge amount of expense and grief for their clients if they get things wrong. An unregulated firm is less likely to have insurance to cover this.

I wonder whether Mr Gill is going to recover the costs he has incurred in this case from Remove a Tenant? Or the unpaid rent if the Kassams are still living in the property without paying rent? Had the Gill’s used a regular solicitor the Kassams would probably be gone by now.

What this means for you

If you help landlords with evictions

Maybe you are a letting agent or maybe you offer assistance at a lower fee than solicitors do.

If so – you should read this judgment very carefully. It is now on record that certain types of assistance by unregulated advisers are an illegal act.

You may want to change the way that you work. Now this issue has been looked at by the Courts and made public, the authorities are likely to be less forgiving.

If you are a landlord

You need to be very careful who you use to do your eviction work. It is better to use a proper firm of solicitors as then you will not have the problems that Mr Gill had.

If you are looking for a firm online, their website should say if they are solicitors or check the ‘about us’ section. Or you can look them up on the Law Society directory.  Make sure they are a firm which specialises in this type of work as not all solicitors do.

If you want to know how much it will cost you, I wrote about this here.

Or of course, you can always do the work yourself – perhaps with the assistance of our online guide.

But do be careful. I will end with some comments made by David Smith of Anthony Gold (also Director of Policy at the Residential Landlords Association) in his post here

It may appear that these type of unregulated “specialists” are keenly priced and so a good deal.

But the costs of their mistakes and the fact that they are not actually permitted to offer legal services leaves landlords at risk of far greater legal fees further down the line.

To make matters worse their unregulated status means that there is little comeback for landlords if things go wrong.

In the increasingly complex world of residential landlord and tenant law it is perhaps better to rely on a skilled firm of solicitors rather than an “eviction specialist” who is anything but.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: Eviction, Eviction Procedure

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« The Landlord Law Conference 2018 Video
Foundations in Landlord and tenant law – summing it all up »

Comments

  1. hbWelcome says

    September 4, 2018 at 9:33 AM

    That is a lovely puff piece for solicitors but it ignores the fact that most regular solicitors are clueless about landlord & tenant law. They wouldn’t know what a n325 was if it bit them on the backside.

    “Had the Gill’s used a regular solicitor the Kassams would probably be gone by now.”

    No chance. They’d have been in exactly the same position but with a larger bill to pay.

    If you had said a skilled solicitor specialising in evictions, then I would completely agree.

    As for;

    “Even if they do get it wrong (and of course they do sometimes, no-one is perfect), all solicitors are covered by extensive and comprehensive (and very expensive) professional indemnity insurance.  So their clients are protected.”

    Your average Joe trying to make a complex claim against a firm of solicitors, backed up by a very expensive indemnity insurance company, has two Hopes
    -and one of them played golf.

    (None of which is to say you don’t have a valid point about “eviction specialists”.)

    • Tessa Shepperson says

      September 4, 2018 at 10:19 AM

      True, you need to be careful which solicitors you use and I think I say this in the post on how much it costs to evict a tenant.

      But a firm like Landlord Action would have got the Kassams out by now for sure.

      I’ll add a bit the post about choosing experienced eviction solicitors.

  2. David Kalokoh says

    September 4, 2018 at 11:35 AM

    I believe landlord action started out as an unregulated eviction company until partnering up with a solicitor many years later. Anthony Gold is a firm of Barristers that Landlord Law refer to regularly !.. who incidentally, Giles Peaker in his Nearly Legal blog recently covered the very same case with as much criticism of “un-regulated” eviction companies as this post !..

    My own view is that there will be good and bad on both sides of the fence.. and not all landlords will be able to afford the prices of so called regulated experts who also get it spectacularly wrong at times !..

    I would say if looking at any company – regulated or un regulated. Look at their reviews , decide if they are genuine or not !.. and do some research !.. don’t fall for the “they are unregulated so must be crap” narrative !.. especially from those with vested interests who may be seeing a reduction in their bottom line !..

    • Tessa Shepperson says

      September 4, 2018 at 11:45 AM

      Landlord Action were originally a ‘claims adjuster’ type firm but they always had, so far as I am aware, proper solicitors doing the work. They became regulated by the SRA in September 2013 and are now owned by Hamilton Fraser Insurance.

      Anthony Gold are solicitors not barristers.

      The point is that it is a criminal offence for an unregulated firm to ‘conduct litigation’ and landlords may find that any possession order they obtain is set aside because of this. It nearly happened to Mr and Mrs Gill …

  3. John Caxton says

    September 4, 2018 at 12:36 PM

    I disagree. There are specialist firms of solicitors that are experts in L & T law and offer fixed fees lower than those charged by the company named in the Judgement. I agree there is not much profit in it but they are out there nonetheless.

  4. Debbie says

    September 5, 2018 at 11:23 AM

    So as a letting agent I’m not even allowed to do the Section 21 or Section 8 ?

    • Tessa Shepperson says

      September 5, 2018 at 11:37 AM

      Oh yes, you can do that. What you can’t do is draft up the court paperwork for bringing an eviction claim through the courts and manage the litigation.

      The Judge made it clear in the Gill case that the agents were entitled to serve the section 8 notice. Unfortunately however they got it wrong!

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Sign up to our
>> daily updates

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Tessa Shepperson

Why you need and how to get proper legal advice on landlord and tenant issues

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept