• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

The shocking truth about criminal letting agents today

July 10, 2019 by Ben Reeve-Lewis

No justiceAnd how the law is unable to stop them

I read this article recently on an FOI request conducted by the National Landlord’s Association, revealing that 53% of local authorities have not prosecuted any letting agents and that 32% have prosecuted only three or fewer letting agents.

CEO Richard Lambert said

“This must stop”.

Regular readers, perhaps Richard himself, might fall off their chairs when I say

“I completely agree with the NLA”.

Perhaps the biggest change I have seen in three decades is the explosion in the past 8 years or so, in the number of letting agents and in particular, the worst kinds of dodgy shysters that you can imagine.

At the bottom end of renting this type of letting agents absolutely dominate the market where people are the most desperate to rent and the downmarket landlords happy to pay cheaper fees, where all transactions are done on a nod and wink.

Letting agents – a growing trend

Last year the lovely Marion Money, herself of the NLA, pointed an officer from the Serious Crime Squad to Safer Renting, who were seeking some input on a problem they noticed, that whenever raiding a brothel, or a property used for people trafficking, nine times out of ten there was a letting agent involved in it.

My crew has been working for three years in five London boroughs, dealing with around 350 referred families, usually in illegal rent to rent scams and in virtually every single case a dodgy letting agent was at the heart of the shenanigans. Back when I started, you usually had the odd one or two agents, who you dealt with on a weekly basis, now its nearly every case and there’s an army of them.

So why are so few letting agents being prosecuted?

Well, I’ll give you the view from the frontline, as a someone who has to get up at 5am and raid these properties under warrants with the police.

Enforcement staffing issues

The legislation used to tackle rogue agents is down to Trading Standards, not housing. Whilst I regularly bemoan the problem of lack of staff and resources in housing enforcement, the stark fact is there are even fewer Trading Standards officers than there is of us.

Also, unlike housing enforcement, a TS officer’s role isn’t just housing, or even letting agents. They are responsible for under-age sales, counterfeit tobacco, fake booze, DVD factories, fraud and as I am reliably informed, their biggest problem, doorstep crime. The sort of people who fleece your granny out of her pension.

Thanks to the complexity of letting agent regulations, they are well down the list of achievable goals. Most London boroughs will have several hundred letting agents, most of the newer crop, complete crooks. Dealing with all of this is perhaps two Trading Standards officers in your borough if you are lucky.

I recently attended a meeting of the Lettings Industry Council where around 150 concerned letting agents gathered to share information on the criminals who blight their industry. There were more individuals in that room than the entire Trading Standards compliment of every London borough combined.

Bureaucracy

The law is not designed to deal with the sorts of outright frauds being perpetrated by the rogue agents. Laws are, as usual, designed for the average Joe, the person who obeys them and would be horrified to know they had broken them.

Running a fraudulent agency is a lucrative business, that’s why it attracts those sorts of people and the law doesn’t matter to them.

The public often woefully misunderstand enforcement of any type, presuming that the council can just hand out tickets, like parking offences and that’s the end of it.

But, in reality, every sanction given to Trading Standards and housing comes with a complex set of appeal procedures, caveats, standards of proof and get out of jail free cards, rendering the road to a successful prosecution, as fraught with pitfalls as a game of Snakes and Ladders.

When you read a story in a paper of a rogue landlord or agents being fined it doesn’t go anywhere near explaining how much work, how many hours went in to even a small result. Hours that are not available, given the size of the problem and the few remaining people left doing the job.

It can sometimes take literally years to put a full case together, while new ones come through the door on a daily basis.

The dodgy letting agents who just shut down

The other huge problem faced when dealing with rogue agents is what happens when you do finally get them on the ropes.

They simply shut up shop.

If they are a limited company they dissolve and any liabilities evaporate along with the limited company status. Many of them are so brazen they don’t even bother to move offices, simply having a shop front makeover and a new name and start all over again.

Of course, all enforcement officers know who they are and were but the slow wheels of bureaucracy have to be put into gear once more. If they weren’t even a limited company it is even easier for them to disappear in a puff of smoke.

Or maybe they are part of the increasing trend of being an online agency based in another country, using Facebook, Gumtree and Spareroom.com to procure tenants from Spain, Georgia or Bulgaria to occupy cheap rooms in London, located in overcrowded, unlicensed, unauthorised death traps, until the council cotton on and the illegal evictions start.

Smoke screens

The problem is the law itself. It just doesn’t work.

The use of aliases is standard practice and you can’t get a successful prosecution unless you can prove, to the court’s satisfaction, that the person subject to the action is genuinely the person who breached the vast range of laws, which all have their own standards of proof.

Then trying to gather information for a prosecution, every witness you talk to has been given a different name by the same employees of the agency and if you do manage to cobble together two accounts where the same name has been used, you call the agents and get told:

“They no longer work here”

The law is a complete joke. It is not designed to protect anyone from the exploitation of it by criminals, who operate in the bottom end of the market to such an extent that they are literally an epidemic, similar to Ebola.

So what can we do?

The NLA are right. It must be stopped but the legal machinery put in place to stop it is an illusion and where tiny rays of light might exist the councils lack the resources to enforce because the government hates local authorities and have been attacking them for years.

Blaming councils is the same lazy ploy being used by so many these days, including the NLA in this instance.

Look to the law-makers and to government as well as a rental system gone mad for profit and investment over the notion of homes. The bottom end of the private rented sector is dominated by letting agents who are no more than thugs, drug dealers, fraudsters and people traffickers.  Which wasn’t the case before austerity measures kicked in.

I know.

I’ve been involved in it since the 2nd February 1990 and I’m still there.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: News and comment

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Ben Reeve-Lewis

Ben is a founder Member of Safer Renting, an independent tenants rights advice and advocacy service working in partnership with the property licensing and enforcement teams from a number of London boroughs.

« The End of Section 21 – Possession Claims where the Tenant is not at fault
Can tenants insist on timed appointments for new tenant viewings? »

Comments

  1. Peter Jackson says

    July 11, 2019 at 11:45 PM

    You seem to be generalizing from your experience in London to the whole of the UK, but London is not typical. Indeed its housing market is peculiar.

    I would like to know who used to dominate the bottom end of the rental sector before austerity measure kicked in. Your description seems to fit Rachman who was active 60 years ago.I know the specific law he exploited (rent control) was reformed, and I know of a another specific law that was fixed in the 80s (a form of benefit fraud). I don’t beleieve that the crooks weren’t active before and after those times.

    I suspect that the places where the crooks are most likely to use companies and other means to avoid prosecution are the places where prosecution is most likely. Maybe you are partly responsible for the number using letting agents as a front in the areas you work in.

  2. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    July 12, 2019 at 8:19 AM

    Peter in the 7 or so years I’ve writing for Tessa’s blog I have made it abundantly clear that I am positioned uniquely and solely at the gutter end of renting in London. Regular readers, of which I know you are one, all know what I write about and the stories that inspires my contributions. I know nothing of the renting world of Penzance or Tadcaster and I agree, London is peculiar.

    On your point about historic criminal activity. Of course there were crooks around back in the day. The difference is it was the same groups of depressing bullies that all enforcement officers knew through repeated exposure. Since austerity, coupled with sky high rents and the laying off of so many enforcement staff this sector has exploded in numbers looking to make a low risk, fast buck. If this were the 60s, Rachman would have been pushed out of business by the organised gangs operating there now.

    In the two and half weeks since I returned from holiday I’ve dealt with 7 illegal evictions, including a 64 year old carer, currently sleeping on the sofa of her 70 year old dementia patient and a lady currently in hospital following a suicide attempt due to the fear campaign launched against her by her landlord. I’ve been in court on two cases and raided a disused petrol station carved up into 16 hospital style cubicles being used for people trafficking. Nothing like my average working week until austerity kicked in and a world away, I am sure, from the days of Peter Rachman..

    On your last point about me perhaps being responsible for increase in criminal activity, you may be right. And maybe the police are responsible for rapes and burglary. Maybe the fire brigade are responsible for warehouse fires and to correct you there, I am not saying landlords using letting agents as fronts, I’m saying its the agents who are criminals in their own right. Sometimes with the connivance of criminal landlords and sometimes without, ripping off landlord and tenant alike

    • Tessa Shepperson says

      July 12, 2019 at 8:35 AM

      Peter, Ben is not alone in reporting growing crime see the item in todays newsround https://landlordlawblog.co.uk/2019/07/12/tessa-shepperson-newsround-106/

    • Peter Jackson says

      July 12, 2019 at 5:04 PM

      I wasn’t saying you were responsible for an increase in criminal activity, just an increase in criminals using techniques like you describe to protect themselves.

      • Peter Jackson says

        July 12, 2019 at 5:09 PM

        Though I forgot about the landlord who still owes my sister her deposit from when she was a student. I was told he had about 20 aliases.

      • Ben Reeve-Lewis says

        July 12, 2019 at 5:42 PM

        Peter I still dont get your point. How on earth am I responsible for criminals protecting themselves?

        • Peter Jackson says

          July 13, 2019 at 5:39 PM

          If someone threatens the way that criminals are making their money they will respond. Either by taking measures to defend themselves (such as aliases) or by attacking those threatening them,. You say that the criminals you deal with are using methods to make prosecuting them difficult, so they must feel there is a real threat of that happening. You and your colleagues are the source of that threat. Your work is making a difference, making life a little more difficult for the criminals.

          • Ben Reeve-Lewis says

            July 13, 2019 at 8:18 PM

            Oh right. The penny drops.

            It certainly doesnt feel like that Peter.99% of the time these little scamps walk away Scot free into the sunset.

            What keeps me going is the 1% who dont.

            I do get really jaded and wonder why I bother a lot of the time.Same as I get demoralised by Aazon or Google getting away with paying hardy any tax. Nobody seems to care of they get away with it. Even when caught out and fined the penalties are often paltry and you know that the publicised result is only 10% of what they were really up to.

            Thanks to my job I know so many scams and frauds and how to get away with them but I cant bring myslef to do them. Ok, some of it is the fear of being caught, my parents drummed that in haha but a bigger part is I just cant bring myself to treat other human beings that way and drive around in a Porsche while I leave a trail of misery, even though, in rental terms, its really easy.

  3. Dave M says

    July 12, 2019 at 11:55 PM

    the only way to prevent this is licencing. I note that a lot of agencies in my area open and close on a regular basis . in a lot of cases these businesses operate from the same premises, trading for a year or so before disappearing. this often follows rumours of malpractice. a new company then opens up amost immediately after which the whole cycle starts again..

    • Ben Reeve-Lewis says

      July 13, 2019 at 8:26 AM

      Yeah thats exactly it Dave.

      Last year we had a meeting with HMRC about this and they said that they notice in their investigations that often they bulk buy limited company names in advance, ready for when they have to close up suddenly.

      We’re currently working with a consultant on using fraud laws to go after individuals independently of limited liability protection and also looking into the use of s222 of the Local Government Act 1972, which allows a council to take out injunctions against individuals who are a public nuisance to the community. The type of nuisance is not defined in law, just the fact that their activities have a negative effect on people living in a district, so dodgy letting agents may well fit the bill

  4. Peter Jackson says

    July 15, 2019 at 12:03 PM

    There is something I don’t understand.
    As far as I am aware Lprincipals are almost always liable for the actions of their agent., in particular landlords are almost always liable for the actions that letting agents make in their names. It seems that the intent of the law is that you go after the landlord. So how does closing the letting agancy protect the landlord from prosecution? (obviously it will protect the agent from being sued by the landlord) Given that the landlord should normally be on the land registry, and changing the owner requires paying SDLT

  5. Michael Barnes says

    July 15, 2019 at 1:41 PM

    Everyone should email their MP, pointing them at this article (and others of Ben) and asking them to push the government to tackle the real issues of criminal agents and LLs.

    Maybe needs things like:
    * directors of companies (agencies or landlord companies) to be personally liable for criminal and civil penalties
    * Councils able to take over the running of properties that are operated in a criminal manner for, say, 5 years, keeping the proceeds, and at the end of the term requiring the LL to pay for improvements made or the property is sold to cover improvement costs.

  6. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    July 15, 2019 at 2:25 PM

    @Peter there isnt the space to reply on all the variables and the different laws I’m afraid, although as you will see Michael makes a similar point on personal liabilities, which is one of Safer Renting’s manifesto points.

    But @Michael too, There is already the machinery for what you suggest, in the form of an Interim Management Order, that allows the council to take over the management of properties but only when they dont have a licence. Another Safer Renting manifesto point we are campaigning for IMOs to be available for the kinds of sleazeballs we deal with, harassing and illegally evicting tenants.

    AND…………….one thing I am particularly keen on, is pushing for local authorities to claim damages from people who have illegally evicted families where the council have been forced to provide temporary accommodation and re-house. Why should the tax payer cover the costs?

The Enforcement Officer's story

Ben Reeve Lewis

Ben Reeve LewisBen Reeve Lewis has worked for Local Authorities for over 20 years.

First as a Tenancy Relations Officer and now as a freelance Enforcement Officer.

He is a regular writer for the Landlord Law Blog and has also appeared on TV - for example in the first series of Channel Five's Nightmare Tenants, Slum Landlords.

In these posts, he talks about his work trying to help poor tenants in London and track down the criminal landlords who exploit them.

As well as giving his views - based on his experience as a practising enforcement officer - of government policy and practice.

The business models of criminal landlords explained

This is a short series explaining how criminal landlords operate.

  • How tenants are a crop for criminal landlords to harvest
  • Why the real rogue landlords are all about the money
  • Aliases and fake companies in the rogue landlord world
  • How Criminal landlords use dodgy contracts and misdirection
  • The Criminal business model of ‘Rent to Rent’
  • Accommodation models for Criminal Landlords
  • Tackling the problem

An interview with Ben Reeve Lewis (on 18/5/18)

Some recent Posts

(The most recent posts are at the top)
  • Court closures scandal
  • The Shocking truth about criminal letting agents today
  • Property Guardians Revisited
  • Common sense, law and the reality of renting
  • How Rent Repayment Orders work
  • Considering Housing MOTs
  • The New Rugg Report
  • Guardian lettings - is the end in sight>
  • Lessons to be learned from Nottingham Letting Agent Prosecution
  • Signatures and the Companies Act
  • Considering the New HMO Regulations
  • Select Committee Report
  • Tenant or renter
  • Police colluding with landlors in illegal evictions
  • European Renting
  • Fitness for Habitation bill
  • Tenants bins
  • Interim and Final Management Orders
  • Implied Surrender
  • Intentional Homelessness
  • The state of our County Courts
  • What homelessness units say to tenants and why
  • The emerging trend of Meter Tampering
  • Fire Safety in Micro Units
  • The Club Member Scam
  • How do we find slum properties?
  • The startling story of tenants who dare not ask for rent receipts
  • Does licensing landlords really do any good?
  • What do you really know about Rogue Landlords?
  • The Growing Problem of Cannabis Farms in Rented Properties
  • Protecting tenants whose Landlords face mortgage repossession proceedings
  • A warning to new landlords taking over existing tenancies


>> Click here for more posts by Ben.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept