• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

Is ten years too late to claim the penalty for an unprotected deposit?

July 14, 2020 by Tessa Shepperson

flatHere is a question to the blog clinic from Andrew (not his real name) who is a tenant:

I am a tenant and have been served with a section 21 notice to leave the property.

Our deposit was never secured in a tenancy deposit scheme, which I’ve known about for a while. I have never requested our deposit be placed in a TDS or returned through fear of retaliation and eviction. We have now lived here for over ten years.

Have we missed our opportunity to demand the deposit is returned and seek compensation (not that we’re looking to do this), or do we have a claim as we’ve lived here using the same agreement during this time?

Answer

If your landlord has failed to protect the deposit then:

  • Your landlord cannot serve a valid section 21 notice until the deposit money has been returned to you, but
  • You have almost certainly lost your chance to claim the penalty

Dealing with the last item first, which is the main basis of your question, your claim will probably be ‘statute barred’ by now.

Claims need to be brought within a certain period of time, under the Limitation Act 1980. The time period for a claim for the deposit penalty is six years. So your time to bring a claim for the penalty ran out four years ago – sorry.

However, the section 21 notice served by your landlord is invalid as the deposit has not been protected.  So you have a valid defence to any claim he may bring based upon it.

The only way your landlord can serve a valid section 21 notice is to refund the whole of your deposit payment to you first.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: News and comment

Scroll down for the comments

Landlord Law for Landlords

Are you a landlord, unsure how to manage your properties in these uncertain times?  My Landlord Law service can help you in this crisis by providing online help and guidance and giving you one to one advice in the members' forum area.

>> Find out more about Landlord Law.


IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« Landlord Law Blog Roundup from 28th June
Tessa Shepperson Newsround #154 »

Comments

  1. alan armstrong says

    July 14, 2020 at 8:37 AM

    Is it statute barred as the offence is still being committed.

    • Ben Reeve-Lewis says

      July 14, 2020 at 1:11 PM

      S5 Of the Limitation Act states:-
      “An action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued”

      Our argument is that the “Cause of action” would kick in on day 31. I dont think the continuing offence argument would wash. Mind you, having said that, I’ve obtained arrest warrants against landlords for illegal eviction, on the basis that although the lock change has already happened, the fact that the tenant cant get back in, means its a continuing offence, so maybe you have a point Alan. One for the lawyers though

  2. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    July 14, 2020 at 11:51 AM

    Agree, he’s 4 years out of time but worth noting here that the 6 year limitation is taken from the breach, not when the deposit was paid. So effectively there’s 30 days to add to it. We’ve got two cases going through court at the moment where this is the case

  3. Jacqui Swann says

    July 14, 2020 at 4:43 PM

    If there was a fixed term, the periodic tenancy that followed would constitute a new tenancy. This would trigger the requirement to secure the deposit and provide the prescribed information again. Under S215B (1) and (2) of the Deregulation Act 2015 the obligation to deal with the deposit again after the end of the fixed term is only waived where the deposit was dealt with appropriately at the start of the original tenancy. How long was the fixed term?

    It may also worth thinking about whether the AST was executed as a deed rather than a simple contract where limitation may be 12 years.

  4. Lawcruncher says

    July 18, 2020 at 9:27 AM

    The right to the “compensation” arises under statute. The limitation period for sums recoverable by statute is 6 years from the date on which the cause of action accrued. In the absence of any additional obligation imposed by the tenancy agreement, the failure to protect is not a breach of contract. It is unclear from the Housing Act 2004 when time starts to run. It could be (a) the date the deposit is paid, (b) the expiry of the time limit to secure protection, or (c) the expiry of the tenancy. I am not aware of any decision on the point.

  5. John says

    July 23, 2020 at 12:13 AM

    An argument I’ve heard suggested by a penalty claims firm, given that this appears to be, as yet, untested in court, is that it is quite possible for the tenant not to be aware that the deposit was supposed to be protected (for example if he was not given the “How to Rent” booklet). He might therefore not become aware of the failure of the landlord or agent to perform their legal duty to protect (and indeed of their duty as professionals to inform the customer, by way of the ‘prescribed information’, of his right to have had the deposit protected) until the point where he tries to retrieve his deposit only to find that the landlord then demands various bogus deductions. This is the point where a lot of tenants suddenly feel hard done-by so it is often the very first time that they start to enquire about their rights regarding the deposit, which would only ever usually be on ending of their occupation of the property. Had the ‘prescribed information’ been served as required by law then the tenant WOULD have been informed of his rights. So the failure to inform creates the situation whereby the landlord benefits by the tenant remaining ignorant until the six-year time-limit has run out.

    This creates a scenario whereby an unknowingly disadvantaged tenant can lose the right to remedy the as yet unknown disadvantage by the effluxion of time. Does the law have any provision for this kind of situation?

    As a comparison the recent case involving gas certificates still seemed to make a breach unfixable at any time in the future if the gas certificate was never actually obtained (as opposed to being fixable if it originally existed but was simply not shown to the tenant prior to occupation).

Its good to talk


>> See all blog clinic posts posts

>> Click here for the Blog Clinic form
>> Click here for the Blog Clinic Fast Track

The Clinic in a Nutshell

- You send us your problem using our special form
- We post it as a normal blog post, do our answer and ask readers to comment
- You agree that you won't hold people responsible (or legally liable) if they give a wrong answer
- You understand that you may not get any readers answers - it is up to readers whether they comment or not
- We won't publish everything - whether or not we publish someone's question is entirely up to us
- However if you use the Fast Track service you will get your question answered within 14 days or your money back

We may be able to help with problems with:

- Tenancy agreements
- Tenancy deposits
- HMOs
- Disrepair issues
- Eviction
- Harassment
(This is not an exhaustive list!)

However we won’t publish questions on:

- Long leases
- Commercial tenancies
- Agricultural tenancies
- Owner occupier problems
- Rented properties outside England & Wales UK
- Neighbour disputes (unless perhaps they are landlord and tenant related)
- Social housing problems (eg where the local authority or a housing association is your landlord)

So please do not ask question on these topics.

Recent Blog Clinic Posts

Summarising accelerated possession proceedings defences

Do both tenants need to agree to activate a break clause?

rented property

What recourse do landlords have against their letting agent if tenants leave with rent arrears?

House - joint and several liability

Can your landlord name you in eviction proceedings after you have served a Notice to Quit & moved out?

More Posts from this Category

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2020 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2021 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept