• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

Who can claim victory in the battle of landlords and tenants?

December 14, 2020 by Tessa Shepperson

When you read or listen to landlords and landlord organisations and then listen to tenants and tenants organisations it sometimes sounds as if they are on different planets. 

Or (more worryingly) on different sides of a battleground. 

Both of them say they feel powerless and at the mercy of the others. But surely they can’t both be right.

Or can they?

And is the current situation one which is going to last?

Let’s take a look first at things today from the point of view of both tenants and landlords:

Why tenants think it is better for landlords

In my recent podcast with Ben Beadle, our guest Justin Bates said that it was definitely landlords who were in the better place.

His main reason was that demand currently outstrips supply, so landlords have a degree of choice and flexibility that tenants do not have:

  • They set the rent
  • They can insist on guarantors
  • They choose the terms of the tenancy
  • They decide whether to offer a break clause
  • And, if they want to get a tenant out (in normal circumstances) they can do this under the mandatory possession grounds.

This means, Justin concluded, that structurally, landlords are more powerful than tenants.  Even though individual landlords may be in difficulties. 

Another argument I have seen from tenants is that at the end of a long tenancy tenants are left with nothing and the landlord is left with their mortgage paid off. Which (they say) is unfair.

Other tenants consider that the very fact that one person can earn money by renting property to another is unfair and unacceptable and say that property should be distributed more evenly. Something which is unlikely to happen in today’s society.

What about the landlord’s view?

Why landlords think it’s better for tenants

Landlords main complaint is around control of their properties. Once they allow a tenant into occupation, whatever the tenant has agreed to in the tenancy agreement, there is little that landlords can do, while the tenants remain in occupation, to stop them doing what they want.

When it comes down to it, there are really only three weapons that landlords can use:

1 Injunction proceedings

This is expensive and is rarely done, the most common type of injunction is the ‘gas injunction’ normally brought by social landlords against tenants who refuse to allow gas safety inspections.

2 Evicting the tenant

Even in normal times, this takes a very long time, up to six months or more, and tenants can run up a lot of rent arrears and cause a lot of damage during that time

3 Financial claims against the tenant

However, once the deposit is used up there is little a landlord can do to enforce this (the court enforcement procedures being notoriously ineffective) and most landlords don’t bother.

Many landlords, stuck with tenants trashing their properties and refusing to pay the rent, feel as if tenants are taking them for a ride with impunity. Causing them massive damage and expense with no comeback.

There is also the problem of taxation and many landlords consider the taxation regime for landlords to be deeply unfair. They are taxed on the basis that their income is ‘unearned’ but have to comply with ever-increasing and confusing regulation.

In short

  • The main issue for tenants is that landlords are the gatekeepers for accommodation and can impose what conditions they like as a condition of allowing people access. And that they can, ultimately, force tenants to leave.
  • The main issue for landlords is that once tenants are in occupation, there is little that landlords can do to control what they do there, and that the process of removing them takes too long – which causes them substantial financial loss which is mostly irrecoverable. Plus they are unhappy about the tax regime and increasing and confusing regulation.

Are there any solutions?

Looking at landlords first – the main solution for them is a careful choice of tenant. It really is the most important thing. Then once tenants are in, provided the tenants are ‘good people’, treating them well will result in goodwill allowing both parties to work together to overcome any issues.

As has happened in numerous rented properties during the pandemic.

There is also the fact that landlording (if I can call it that) is essentially a business and no business is risk-free. The main protection against risk is insurance, which can be expensive.

So far as tenants are concerned, they need to present themselves as someone a landlord will trust as a tenant. Then they are more likely to be selected. Once in occupation, the better they behave as tenants the less likely their landlords are to want to evict them.

Very few landlords (other than those needing to sell up) will want to evict a tenant who is paying rent and looking after the property well.

Changes on the horizon

Things may be changing though. COVID has changed many things including working practices. Vast numbers of people are now working from home and so can move out of the large cities and find somewhere larger, cheaper and more congenial than a city centre rabbit hutch.

Although we often read articles telling us that there is a housing shortage, other articles tell a different story. They tell us that there is no actual shortage of property – just a shortage of property where people need to live.

But if people no longer need to live in those places, then this changes the balance.

A recent article on Property118 points out that:

  • 27% of renters in London plan to move after the pandemic has ended,
  • 49% of those are determined to leave the city,
  • giving a projected 13% net exodus of renters from London, and
  • 60% of all renters who plan on moving post-Covid-19 are not looking to move to a major city

Furthermore, it seems that large numbers of younger people are now living with their parents and so are no longer in the market for accommodation.

Already it is predicted that rents in London are due to fall, giving more power to those tenants who still need to live there.

Also, if as predicted more government departments move to the North, and if new green industries are developed in the old industrial cities then this will encourage more people to move to the North where much of the surplus accommodation is to be found.

Already there are moves to create a huge low carbon industrial hub in the Humber region which could massively affect the prosperity of the surrounding area.

Tenants may find over the coming years, that they are more powerful than they think.

Conclusion

As always arguments are based on what has happened in the past. And in the past landlords have been more powerful because, as Justin pointed out in the podcast, in most cases demand outstrips supply so they are on the ones with the whip hand.

However, this may change.

The change in working practices and the new industries which we all hope will be developed to combat climate change may result in a massive change in demand with a shift towards country living and (hopefully) the north.

Which will work in favour of good landlords in areas where property was previously in short supply. If there is a surplus – tenants are not going to tolerate poor housing and will vote with their feet.

Returning to the landlord v. tenant debate, I think this is the wrong approach. If both parties regard the other as ‘the enemy’ then things are more likely to go wrong.  Both parties should regard each other as an equal and necessary partner working together to make the tenancy work.

There are bad landlords and bad tenants but they are in a minority – and both landlords and tenants should work together to eliminate them.  

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: News and comment

Scroll down for the comments

Landlord Law for Landlords

Are you a landlord, unsure how to manage your properties in these uncertain times?  My Landlord Law service can help you in this crisis by providing online help and guidance and giving you one to one advice in the members' forum area.

>> Find out more about Landlord Law.


IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« Tessa Shepperson Newsround #175
Tessa Shepperson Newsround #176 »

Comments

  1. Paul Barrett says

    December 16, 2020 at 3:37 PM

    It is not a case of rents being higher in areas where tenants need to be.
    It is invariably where they want to be.

    Of course this maybe because of need.
    LL do NOT create the market.
    It is demand that creates the market.
    LL then seek to supply that market.

    It is the tenant that is in complete control of a tenancy.

    They know all they have to do is get their foot in rhe door.

    Once done then they know they can live rent free for years.

    Very few tenants or any guarantors qualify for RGI.

    Believe me if in ONLY cases of RENT DEFAULT LL could remove such tenants without ANY court action being required after 2 month’s rent default which is 1 month and 1 day then LL would be back in control.

    95% of evictions relate to rent defaulting.

    After a 14 day notice to vacate following the 2 months rent default a LL could remove a tenant after a total of 46 days.

    Only if the tenant paid the full rent arrears would the LL be prevented from evicting.
    Police might be required to assist if a tenant refuses to comply with the LL requirements to vacate.

    Such a 46 period would immediately return power to the LL.
    Tenants would know that providing they paid the FULL CONTRACTUAL RENT then invariably the LL wouldn’t wish to remove them.

    I would allow rents to only be increased annually even if a new AST has bern issued for the same tenants.

    All other reasons for eviction to go via the S8 process.

    For RENT DEFAULTING

    46 days of failing to pay rent and tenant is removed by LL with Police assistance if necessary.

    NO County Court action being required.

    Rent defaulting is hardly subjective.

    The FULL CONTRACTUAL RENT either has or hasn’t been paid.

    Of course not all LL would choose to evict in 46 days but they could.

    Such a possibility would tend to concentrate the minds of feckless tenants wonderfully!!!!

    A simple concept pay your rent and remain in occupation!!

    A concept that many tenants consider DOESN’T apply to them.

    If LL are unable to recover their properties easily from rent defaulting tenants then LL will just sell up.

    There is no point being a LL if rent defaulting tenants cannot easily be got rid of.

  2. John says

    March 8, 2021 at 1:46 PM

    1) Why should the Police get involved in a civil dispute over money? No crime has been committed.
    2) What if the rent arrears was due to housing benefit admin and nothing to do with the tenant?
    3) What if the tenant had withheld rent as a last resort to get the landlord to fulfil his side of the contract? That situation would need to be judged by an impartial third party.

    If you were to get your way though would you be happy to forego the dreadful regime of Section 21 so that good tenants could settle long-term and not be in fear of the house randomly being sold with vacant possession or the landlord suddenly wanting to house his little brother returning from world travels?

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Landlord Law Virtual Conference 2021

Make sure you and your staff are fully up to date with the law – remember the only 100% protection against penalties and fines is 100% compliance!

Our virtual Conference has expert legal speakers and the recordings will be available for 3 months after the event.

Click here to find out more

Free Webinars

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Choose whether you want to get
>> daily updates or just the
>> weekly roundups

You will also get a FREE Ebook!

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Coronavirus

Landlords and the Coronavirus Emergency – keeping records

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2020 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2021 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept