• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Tessa Shepperson Newsround #182

February 12, 2021 by Tessa Shepperson

More news items for you on a Friday. Starting with a couple of bad news items for letting agents (sorry!).

Agents threatened by rental deposit signature case

Agents listening to solicitor David Smith on a  recent Fixflo webinar were shocked to learn that they could be at risk following on from little known High Court decision about the signature of documents on behalf of limited companies.

The case is reported by David on the JMW blog here saying

There is a general statutory requirement under section 44 of the Companies Act 2006, which requires signing by either two directors, a director and a company secretary, or a director before a witness. However, it has never been clear how this should be done in the context of statutory notices, such as section 8 notices under the Housing Act 1988 or tenancy deposit protection certificates. Complying with this requirement can be burdensome and often impractical in the context of a landlord and tenant relationship. The issue was recently considered by the High Court in Northwood Solihull Ltd v Fearn & Ors (2020) EWHC 3538 (QB).

The case decided that as a landlord’s signature is not a statutory requirement on section 8 notices, the failure to comply with section 44 will not invalidate them.  Even if strictly speaking it is a requirement, it is something the courts are entitled to overlook.

However, this is not the case with Prescribed Information certificates.  Here, anyone signing the form on behalf of a limited company, be they landlord or agent, should ensure that their signature complies with section 44.

Where this has not been done, landlords may be subject to a penalty for breach of section 214 of the Housing Act 2004. Furthermore, any section 21 notice served prior to rectification of the defective prescribed information certificate would be invalidated.

This applies to prescribed information served before 25 March 2015 and is likely to apply to prescribed information served after that date.

David suggests in his article that the best solution to this would be for the government to ‘tweak the regulations’ through the planned Renters Reform Bill – ideally by eliminating the need to sign at all.  Read David’s article here.

In the fixflo webinar, David said

The reality of this case is that, as things currently stand, if you as an agent have signed a proscribed [rental deposit] information certificate on behalf of a landlord and you’re a corporate agent, then if it has not been signed by a director and witnessed, then the certificate will be defective.

This means attempting to serve a Section 21 will not be possible, and a tenant could turn around make a claim against you for up to three times the original deposit.

So I am concerned about the possibility of a massive blast of claims against agents because the High Court judgement is retrospective going back six years as well as looking forward.

This could wipe out some lettings agencies if their insurance won’t cover it.

More insurance payout problems for agents

Many agents will have hoped for a payout after the Supreme Court decision which basically supported business interruption insurance clients.

However, it seems that Hiscox, whose policies were sold via Propertymark-approved broker Gallagher, is claiming that agents are not entitled to claim as they were not subject to ‘mandatory closure’.  They are now emailing their agent database telling them this.

Agent Ben Williams of Wooton Estate Agents, as reported on the Negotiator, has pointed out that they were following official guidance – guidance issued on 27 March said

In line with advice for certain businesses to close, agents should not open branches to the public during this period, or visit people’s homes to carry out market appraisals.

He wants to know what Proertymark are going to do to support the hundreds of agents who will be out of pocket due to this.  The story continues …

Cladding fund

The government’s announcement of a £3.5bn fund to fix dangerous cladding on high-rise buildings in England has had a mixed response.  Many welcome the announcement, with others saying that it will ‘barely scratch the surface of the cladding crisis’.

For example, the Guardian reports here on four residents affected by the scandal who tell their story.

Summing it, it looks as if the general feeling is that it is a good start but not enough.

Trustpilot and freedom of speech

There is an interesting argument building about reviews left on Trustpilot after a legal firm, Summerfield Browne, won a libel case against a reviewer whose review was, they claimed, false and defamatory.

Trustpilot is, however, saying that this is a threat to freedom of speech, saying

Trustpilot had never been contacted by Summerfield Browne, nor had the review been flagged to Trustpilot using our complaints process for reporting reviews, despite that being freely available to anyone.  …

As a public, open, review platform we believe in consumers having the ability to leave feedback – good or bad – about a business at any time. If consumers are left fearful of leaving negative reviews, this could result in consumers being misled about the quality of a business, and businesses being deprived of the valuable feedback from which they can learn, improve and grow …

it is much better for businesses to engage, respond and improve upon the feedback they receive, rather than using legal action to silence consumers.”

What do YOU think?

Snippets

  • Could Foxtons cyber-attack be more serious than first thought?
  • Housing mediation pilot must not replace the usual routes to access justice
  • Letting agents urged to help landlords navigate new licensing rules
  • Buy to let investors wooed by barrister offering specialist tax  advice
  • Landlords and tenants get on badly? Don’t you believe it...
  • Warning sounded on rent arrears post-lockdown
  • Workers at risk by going into workplace unnecessarily, say unions
  • Falling rental values are drawing people back in to prime central London

Newsround will be back next week.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: News and comment

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« The law has NOT been changed to allow tenants to keep pets
Landlord Law Blog Roundup from 18th January »

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Sign up to our
>> daily updates

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

Tessa Shepperson

Why you need and how to get proper legal advice on landlord and tenant issues

Tessa’s Podcast

The Landlord and Lawyer Podcast

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept