• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Landlord lives abroad. Lodger refuses to leave. Advice please!

June 21, 2021 by Tessa Shepperson

HousesHere is a question to the blog clinic fast track from Vera (not her real name) who is a landlord.

I am a live-in landlady and I am experiencing problems with a lodger. I felt forced to give him notice because of his anti-social behaviour during the pandemic. The other lodgers feel threatened by his behaviour, the cleaner that works for me also complained. Especially one lodger who has an autoimmune disease decided to move out because of his behaviour.

I have sought advice at the Tower hamlet housing service. I have been collaborative, but I feel not listened to by the service, harassed by the lodger’s accusation and by the way the situation has been handled by the housing advisor.

I gave the lodger one month notice and extended it to 5 weeks, as the lodger is refusing to move out and to communicate with me. He also claims that because he has never met me in person I am not a live-in landlady. I made him an excluded tenancy agreement, room only, which we both signed. I also provide lodgers with services (eg. cleaner, fixer, British Gas home care, and insurance for repairmen). 

The agreement had a fixed term of six months, after which he didn’t ask for a renewal. He moved in during the pandemic in September 2020, and the pandemic is the reason why I have never met him. He was made aware of my situation.

The property has been my home since 2010. I am temporarily out of the country for family and health reasons, and I haven’t been able to go back home to my property and the UK since the end of January 2020.

I had some health issues shortly before the pandemic started ( a miscarriage) while I was abroad and fortunately became pregnant in March 2020. Because of the health risk that covid entails, and the fact that I am a new mum and that my partner does not live in the UK, it has been for me very difficult to go back home.

This does not mean that my property is not my home. I am currently organising with a migration solicitor to prepare the right documents for my partner and my son to go with me to the UK. I would like to know what my rights are in this situation.

Answer

The things to consider here are

  • whether the occupier has a tenancy or is a lodger and
  • whether you can be treated as a resident landlord for the purposes of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977.  

Probably the most important issue is whether or not you can rely on the Protection from Eviction act.  The reason for this is that live-in landlords who share living accommodation with their tenants do not need to get a Court Order for possession.  Even if the occupier has a tenancy.  

So what does the Protection from Eviction Act say about this?

Occupiers rights under the Protection from Eviction Act.

  • Section 1 says that it will be a criminal offence to ‘unlawfully’ deprive any occupier of residential premises (whether they are a licensee or have a tenancy) unless you have good reason to believe that they have vacated. 
  • Section 2 says that the ‘right of re-entry’ found in many forfeiture clauses, can only now be done by obtaining a court order 
  • Section 3 specifically says that landlords have to get a court order for possession if they want to evict anyone in their property – regardless of whether that person is a tenant or a licensee.

This rule is mitigated however by section 3A which says that for certain types of occupation you can evict without having to get a court order first. 

These are known as ‘excluded tenancies and licensees’.  They include lodgers, holiday lets and where people are allowed to stay for free.

So does this lodger exclusion apply to you?  Let’s take a look and see what the act says about it:

(2) A tenancy or licence is excluded if—

(a) under its terms the occupier shares any accommodation with the landlord or licensor; and
(b) immediately before the tenancy or licence was granted and also at the time it comes to an end, the landlord or licensor occupied as his only or principal home premises of which the whole or part of the shared accommodation formed part.

Subsection 3 says that a similar rule will apply if the landlords family had been occupying the property rather than the landlord.  However, I don’t think this applies to you as you have not mentioned any family members.

Subsequent clauses make it clear that sharing accommodation means actual living rooms not things like an area used for storage nor a staircase, passage, corridor or other means of access;

Your case

The critical question here is, were you living at the property at the time you rented the room to this lodger?  You say have not lived in the property since January 2020 and the occupier moved into his room in September 2020.  So obviously not.  

In which case, I am afraid that whatever his occupation type, you will need to get a court order for possession if you want this person to leave.  The fact that he signed an ‘excluded tenancy agreement’ will not change this.  

You will therefore need to bring possession proceedings through the courts. 

Tenancy or license?

The procedure you use to evict this occupier will depend on whether he has a tenancy or a license.  In my view he will have a tenancy UNLESS his agreement provides for the cleaner (and your other employees) to go in and clean his room as of right AND this actually happens.  So, if your cleaner only ever cleans the common parts of the property and never goes into his room, he will have a tenancy.

Posts on this blog that explain this can be found here and here.

So you will need to speak to the cleaner and find out what actually happens.  You need to get this right as if you bring legal proceedings for possession on the wrong basis, they will just be chucked out by the Judge (and you may have to pay the occupiers legal fees).

What to do next

  • If the occupier has a license you will need to serve a Notice to Quit and then issue proceedings on the basis that he is occupying the property unauthorised after his license has been terminated.
  • If the occupier has a tenancy, it will probably be an assured shorthold tenancy.  You will need to serve a section 21 notice and then issue proceeding after the notice period has expired.

I would strongly advise in this case that you use a firm of solicitors who specialise in this area of law – this is particularly important as you live abroad.

Two firms I would recommend are Landlord Action and JMW Solicitors.  Note that Landlord Law members can instruct these firms online via our special forms and get a discount.  

And finally

You will probably feel this is unfair as the property is ‘your home’.  However, the exceptions to the general rule requiring landlords to get a court order for possession are strictly defined.  As regards the lodger exception, it is specifically aimed at people who are actually sharing living accommodation with the occupier.  

The reason being that in these circumstances, where you have someone actually in your own home, sharing living space with you, it is unreasonable to expect you to go to court (provided you comply with the terms of the lodger’s contract).  

However in your case, you have been living out of the country for over a year (and more particularly, during the entire period this person has been living there), so this exception is not available to you.  The fact that it is ‘your home’ is not relevant if you are not actually living there.  So far as he is concerned you are not a ‘live-in’ landlord.

You are in the same position as other property owners, such as people working in the Foreign Office or the military who are posted abroad, who rent out their property while they are away.  Where in almost all cases the occupier will have an assured shorthold tenancy.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Readers problems Tagged With: ex pat landlords, Lodger

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« The Landlord Law Newsround #199
Landlord Law Newsround #200 »

Comments

  1. John-Paul Keates says

    June 21, 2021 at 10:42 AM

    The query mentions “other lodgers” as well as the problem lodger, which raises the issue of this being an HMO.

    More than two people in more than one household would mean that the property would have to comply with the basic HMO legislation (and the owner plus two people exemption couldn’t apply if the owner wasn’t resident). Most private residences won’t meet the minimum standards required by the HMO regulations.

    If the property has 5 occupants or is in an area with extended licensing (which is true of a number of areas in Tower Hamlets), serving a valid Section 21 notice may not be possible without a licence in place. And the occupants may be entitled to recover their rent with a repayment order.

    I’m somewhat surprised that the housing service hasn’t raised this issue.

    • Tessa Shepperson says

      June 21, 2021 at 10:45 AM

      Yes, I did wonder about this but decided in the end to confine my answer to the question. But you are right, this could well be an HMO.

  2. Thom says

    June 22, 2021 at 7:06 PM

    I do not want to be too harsh on your correspondent Tessa, but this is really an enquiry which shows a troubling lack of familiarity with the basic concepts at play here.

    A point which is perhaps worth noting is that it currently possible for possession action to be brought against an assured tenant on ground 14 (i.e. nuisance or annoyance to another resident) without any minimum notice period. Whilst proceeding in this way has its own pitfalls (e.g. discretionary ground, proving the allegations), it avoids the need for 4 months notice on a s21 and gets the case in front of a judge quicker.

    • Tessa Shepperson says

      June 22, 2021 at 7:26 PM

      Hmm. I generally advise against discretionary grounds as judges rarely grant immediate possession orders.
      So although you may be able to start your claim quicker with ground 14, a s21 may actually get your possession earlier.

      I could be wrong of course …. What do others think?

      • HB Welcome says

        June 23, 2021 at 9:19 AM

        ….I think Thom has never tried evicting anyone using ground 14.

      • Thom says

        June 23, 2021 at 10:37 AM

        Not saying its the right option, just an option. Given that a s21 would mean that the chances of getting the problem tenant out by the end of the year are approaching zero, it is something to consider.

        I should think it would be somewhat easier to get an outright order in a context where the defendant is actively making the other ‘lodgers’ lives a misery than it would be when the defendant has their own premises.

        HB Welcome is right that I have never tried evicting anyone under ground 14 but then again hardly anybody bothered to use it pre-Covid for all the obvious reasons. There is now at least some reason to consider it.

        • HB Welcome says

          June 23, 2021 at 12:24 PM

          Housing associations frequently attempt to use ground 14. They are rarely successful without very long and costly legal battles.

          E.g https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2016/704.html

    • Charlotte Little says

      July 2, 2021 at 12:37 AM

      If I were you Id serve notice on everyone as you are not living there. Sell the house. The Law is always on the tenants side. If anyone is thinking of buy to let, think twice. Good tenants are like gold dust. To be honest it’s not worth the hassle.

Its good to talk


>> See all blog clinic posts posts

>> Click here for the Blog Clinic form
>> Click here for the Blog Clinic Fast Track

The Clinic in a Nutshell

- You send us your problem using our special form
- We post it as a normal blog post, do our answer and ask readers to comment
- You agree that you won't hold people responsible (or legally liable) if they give a wrong answer
- You understand that you may not get any readers answers - it is up to readers whether they comment or not
- We won't publish everything - whether or not we publish someone's question is entirely up to us
- However if you use the Fast Track service you will get your question answered within 14 days or your money back

We may be able to help with problems with:

- Tenancy agreements
- Tenancy deposits
- HMOs
- Disrepair issues
- Eviction
- Harassment
(This is not an exhaustive list!)

However we won’t publish questions on:

- Long leases
- Commercial tenancies
- Agricultural tenancies
- Owner occupier problems
- Rented properties outside England & Wales UK
- Neighbour disputes (unless perhaps they are landlord and tenant related)
- Social housing problems (eg where the local authority or a housing association is your landlord)

So please do not ask question on these topics.

Recent Blog Clinic Posts

Notices

Do tenants need to give their landlord notice they are leaving if the landlord has already served a section 21?

Keys

Can I charge my tenant for a lock change if they lose their keys?

keys

My tenant is in prison, can I repossess the property?

More Posts from this Category

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept