• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Training
  • Tenants
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • The Renters Guide Website
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • Tips

Resident landlord who has used wrong agreement seeks advice

November 18, 2021 by Tessa Shepperson

QuestionHere is a question to the blog clinic from John who is a landlord.

I have a self-contained annex which is part of the main building of my house where I live (it used to be a living room, utility room and conservatory). It has its own council tax banding now which I had to do after purchasing the property and its own registered address which the previous owner registered. All utilities (heating, water, electric etc) are connected to main house as when it was originally built.

From my reading, I understand that I am a resident landlord but have realised I used an assured tenancy agreement which has the heading assured shorthold tenancy. I wasn’t aware of the legal differences and just assumed all 12 months rental agreements with a 6-month break clause were called assured shorthold tenancy. I’m new to this and didn’t realise the legal quagmire around it all.

I’m trying to understand where I stand legally and how do I go about changing the tenancy?

I understand from recent reading that for example if the landlord is resident in the property, this puts the tenancy outside the provisions of the Housing Act 1988 and so the tenancy cannot be an assured or assured shorthold one and the agreement will take effect, but any clause relating to the wrong tenancy type will not be enforceable.

Another issue is then around the TDS as being a resident landlord my tenancy agreement doesn’t mention the TDS but just general conditions on the deposit, deductions from deposit, interest etc and a line that states “Subject to any rules or provisions of the deposit scheme”. As a resident landlord, I don’t need to register the deposit with a TDS but because it states AST on the document where do I stand now? We are 4 months into the tenancy with my tenant.

Answer

You are quite correct, if you live in the same building as your tenants, this cannot be an assured shorthold tenancy.  The reason is that the Housing Act 1988 which is the main statute regulating tenancies sets out in Schedule 1 the type of tenancies which cannot be assured or assured shorthold tenancies – and these include resident landlords (Schedule 1 s10).

So if you have used the wrong form, this will not affect what the tenancy is.  You will just have a tenancy agreement that contains incorrect wording which does not apply to the tenancy.  This is not good but it is not a disaster.  It is not actually illegal (as using a sham license is for example).  You will need to correct things, but this can be at renewal.  

If any issues arise though, for example, if your tenant queries why his tenancy deposit has not been protected, you may need to ‘fess up’ and explain that you used the wrong form by mistake but that you will be correcting this at renewal (assuming the tenant wants to stay on).

So far as the tenancy deposit point is concerned, again you are correct, you are not required to protect the deposit if the tenancy is not an assured shorthold tenancy.  As the deposit rules specifically confine the obligation to protect deposits to ASTs. 

The fact that you have used the wrong form will not change this.  If you are a resident landlord, it is impossible for your tenancy to be an AST and so, regardless of what your agreement says, you are not obliged to protect the deposit in a scheme.

The main result of using the wrong form is confusion and misunderstanding.  Which is clearly not something you want.  So my message to any new landlords reading this is that you need to do a bit of training before renting out property!

My Landlord Law service is specifically designed to help and support landlords so they can manage their properties themselves while complying with the law.  If you are not sure what tenancy type you have, we have a free guide here and also a free Which Tenancy Agreement guide here to help you work out what type of tenancy agreement you need.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Readers problems Tagged With: Tenancy Agreement, Tenancy Deposit

Scroll down for the comments

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant solicitor and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which now hosts Landlord Law and other services for landlords and property professionals.

« Green improvement support for landlords from Local Authorities – Eastleigh to Great Yarmouth
Landlord Law Newsround #221 »

Comments

  1. John Haynes says

    November 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM

    If it’s a self-contained annexe (even with it’s own council-tax banding) the Schedule 1.10 still seems to treat the landlord as “resident” even though he would not be sharing any common areas with the tenant. Many of such annexes even have their own separate entrance and an individual postal address too.

    So are we saying the occupant is still a tenant rather than a lodger, but simply not an AST tenant? In which case what type of tenant would they be and would they have more or fewer rights regarding notice periods?

    • Tessa Shepperson says

      November 23, 2021 at 1:34 PM

      If the accommodation is self-contained it will be an unregulated or common law tenancy. It cannot be an AST if the landlord lives in the same building.

      The tenant’s rights are similar but as it is not an AST, you do not use section 8 or section 21 notices. The notice to serve to end the tenancy is a Notice to Quit. See my post on this here https://landlordlawblog.co.uk/2021/10/12/please-do-not-keep-on-calling-section-8-or-section-21-notices-notices-to-quit/

Its good to talk


>> See all blog clinic posts posts

>> Click here for the Blog Clinic form
>> Click here for the Blog Clinic Fast Track

The Clinic in a Nutshell

- You send us your problem using our special form
- We post it as a normal blog post, do our answer and ask readers to comment
- You agree that you won't hold people responsible (or legally liable) if they give a wrong answer
- You understand that you may not get any readers answers - it is up to readers whether they comment or not
- We won't publish everything - whether or not we publish someone's question is entirely up to us
- However if you use the Fast Track service you will get your question answered within 14 days or your money back

We may be able to help with problems with:

- Tenancy agreements
- Tenancy deposits
- HMOs
- Disrepair issues
- Eviction
- Harassment
(This is not an exhaustive list!)

However we won’t publish questions on:

- Long leases
- Commercial tenancies
- Agricultural tenancies
- Owner occupier problems
- Rented properties outside England & Wales UK
- Neighbour disputes (unless perhaps they are landlord and tenant related)
- Social housing problems (eg where the local authority or a housing association is your landlord)

So please do not ask question on these topics.

Recent Blog Clinic Posts

Notices

Do tenants need to give their landlord notice they are leaving if the landlord has already served a section 21?

Keys

Can I charge my tenant for a lock change if they lose their keys?

keys

My tenant is in prison, can I repossess the property?

More Posts from this Category

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
The Renters Guide
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2021 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2022 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Privacy | Log in

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept